Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Fiendish Thingy

(20,090 posts)

8. And yet, despite playing coy and cocky...

Reply to CousinIT (Reply #6)

Thu May 22, 2025, 10:13 AM

May 22

With the exception of the Garcia case, there hasn’t been overt defiance of a court ruling after the ruling was issued. A couple of razor thin incidents occured regarding the timing of deportation flights, but otherwise, despite tough talk, injunctions, stays and other rulings have been followed so far. (Note that many of the rulings have been quite narrow in scope, only applying to the state/district in which they were made)

Rather than in your face defiance and ignoring of rulings, the administration appears to be sticking to a passive aggressive, play dumb approach for the moment. Perhaps there is some fear that a judge will actually lock up a cabinet member for contempt?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

5 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

CousinIT TheRickles CaptainTruth enigmania scipan

30 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

It's not just billionaire tax cuts. It's CEMENTING TRUMP'S DICTATORSHIP (NEEDS VERIFICATION) [View all] CousinIT May 22 OP

C'mon, let's get this on Greatest! raccoon May 22 #1

I want verification from Dems in the House that that stuff is in the bill. CousinIT May 22 #3

Trump doesn't think you have the right to know. Doodley May 22 #7

Corprat mindset: Throw shit on them and keep them in the dark. Then billionaires get even richer. CousinIT May 22 #9

Profoundly dangerous G.O.P. bill attacking America BoRaGard May 22 #2

It's a "soft revolution" that redefines the role of the executive. LastDemocratInSC May 22 #25

Kick and Rec! Mike 03 May 22 #4

The clause in question would be overturned by the courts. Fiendish Thingy May 22 #5

Unfortunately, I don't think Trump and Republicans would care... CousinIT May 22 #6

And yet, despite playing coy and cocky... Fiendish Thingy May 22 #8

"lock up a cabinet member for contempt" -- won't happen with Bondi in control of the marshals PSPS May 22 #23

The courts have the ability to deputize others to enforce warrants Fiendish Thingy May 22 #29

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State..." CaptainTruth May 22 #12

Agree, we're getting close to that "storm the Bastille" moment. MuirHero May 22 #28

Then they wouldnt bother adding it Mountainguy May 22 #21

"2 branches of government can't neuter the 3rd" -- it's already been done PSPS May 22 #24

They already ignore the courts. Autumn May 22 #22

drumpf's version of the "Enabling Act" of 1933 Germany. talking-liberally May 22 #10

The only thing left is for the Repug Reichstag to recess the House and go home. flashman13 May 22 #14

Exactly what it is. orangecrush May 22 #16

I've been thinking that for a while now... FirstLight May 22 #20

Burning America to the ground Botany May 22 #11

Fuck you MAGA to the hottest of hells! No dictators in the United States. PERIOD. Initech May 22 #13

Kick orangecrush May 22 #15

Kicking for visibility. love_katz May 22 #17

VERIFICATION: Heather Cox Richardson's latest posting begins thus: RobertDevereaux May 22 #18

Republicans in the Senate have a clear choice. Democracy or a Dictator Bengus81 May 22 #19

There really are no moderate Repukes anymore mvd May 22 #26

Thom Hartmann on stripping the courts of contempt power Gaugamela May 22 #27

Tried to call joanbarnes May 22 #30