Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

maxrandb

(16,738 posts)

7. Yes! Some "very narrow" legal issues, right?

Reply to sop (Reply #1)

Thu May 15, 2025, 01:09 PM

May 2025

You are correct in that they will attempt to justify their ruling by declaring it "limited in scope".

It's only "narrow" if you ignore the real world significant legal implications a ruling favorable to Donnie Dipshit will have.

Then Johnny KKK Roberts can pull his best Steve Erkle imitation out.

?feature=shared

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

IMHO - Today's Supreme Court hearing on Birthright Citizenship will lead to Civil War [View all] maxrandb May 2025 OP

Thanks for the link. sop May 2025 #1

If they rule against injuctive relief, that's not "limited in scope" maxrandb May 2025 #2

The fascists will say children of "foreign troops who are in the United States because they are at war with this sop May 2025 #4

Yes! Some "very narrow" legal issues, right? maxrandb May 2025 #7

What if only one of your parents is American born? ecstatic May 2025 #3

Merick Garland, 23-months. .... nt Hotler May 2025 #5

I'll bet the under. BannonsLiver May 2025 #6