Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

maxrandb

(16,746 posts)

2. If they rule against injuctive relief, that's not "limited in scope"

Reply to sop (Reply #1)

Thu May 15, 2025, 09:28 AM

May 2025

Is it?

Especially considering how the fascists will "interpret" it as a "win".

The immunity ruling was described as "limited in scope".

How's that working out?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

IMHO - Today's Supreme Court hearing on Birthright Citizenship will lead to Civil War [View all] maxrandb May 2025 OP

Thanks for the link. sop May 2025 #1

If they rule against injuctive relief, that's not "limited in scope" maxrandb May 2025 #2

The fascists will say children of "foreign troops who are in the United States because they are at war with this sop May 2025 #4

Yes! Some "very narrow" legal issues, right? maxrandb May 2025 #7

What if only one of your parents is American born? ecstatic May 2025 #3

Merick Garland, 23-months. .... nt Hotler May 2025 #5

I'll bet the under. BannonsLiver May 2025 #6