Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Rhiannon12866

(247,066 posts)
Fri Nov 7, 2025, 11:30 PM Nov 7

SCOTUS Majority SLAMMED by Justice Jackson with SCATHING DISSENT - Legal AF



In a scorching dissent addressed to the MAGA 6 on the Supreme Court, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson took her title seriously, and metes out justice to protect the transgender American community who are being forced to have their "gender assigned at birth" listed on their passports, not for some legitimate "foreign affairs" reason, but because Trump hates the community.

Michael Popok reports that KBJ calls out her brethren for "misunderstanding the assignment" when Trump files an emergency appeal, improperly picking "winner and losers" on cases that are not yet developed and ignoring the psychological and emotional harm to a fragile population in our society that needs protection, on his latest hot take. - 11/07/2025.

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

TommyT139

(2,092 posts)
1. Here's a great line from her dissent
Sat Nov 8, 2025, 12:54 AM
Nov 8

...applicable to so many cases these days (emphasis added):

As for the Government’s suggestion that the President is harmed by not being able to impose a uniform definition of sex across various regulatory schemes, that assertion is just another species of the far-fetched contention that the President must be injured whenever he is prevented from doing as he wishes.

All of her dissent, which follows the scant four paragraphs of the majority, is worth a read.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25a319_i4dj.pdf

SunSeeker

(57,267 posts)
2. The Emergency Docket was previously predominated by death penalty cases. The MAGA 6 have corrupted it.
Sat Nov 8, 2025, 12:57 AM
Nov 8

They are using it to stay rulings Trump doesn't like, with no showing of irreparable harm on the government's part. In the death penalty cases, the irreparable harm was obvious: the defendant would be put to death before having a chance to argue his case before the Supreme Court. Here, the Trump Administration will absolutely not suffer any permanent harm. On the contrary, it is the other side that will suffer permanent harm if the Trump administration’s actions are not blocked. But the MAGA 6 don't care. They give Trump the stay of the lower court's adverse ruling 83% of the time! He loses in lower courts 90% of the time, but SCOTUS has become Trump’s weapon against the rule of law.

We must expand the Court to 13 justices when Democrats are back in power.

Rhiannon12866

(247,066 posts)
3. My friend recently suggested the same thing and I agree, SCOTUS has become partisan
Sat Nov 8, 2025, 01:19 AM
Nov 8

I'm just hoping that Alito and Thomas will hang in there until we're rid of TFG, we don't need more RW justices looking to last 40 years on the bench.

Deuxcents

(24,786 posts)
4. I'm not a legal expert but I am much more educated in the law since TSF became president.
Sat Nov 8, 2025, 01:24 AM
Nov 8

I think Justice Jackson has an in depth analytical approach to these issues and her conclusions are so well presented after all the legalese (that I don’t understand) is settled, is pertinent to our ever changing times and norms. I’m starting to really appreciate her appointment.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Liberal YouTubers»SCOTUS Majority SLAMMED b...