Liberal YouTubers
Related: About this forumSCOTUS Majority SLAMMED by Justice Jackson with SCATHING DISSENT - Legal AF
In a scorching dissent addressed to the MAGA 6 on the Supreme Court, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson took her title seriously, and metes out justice to protect the transgender American community who are being forced to have their "gender assigned at birth" listed on their passports, not for some legitimate "foreign affairs" reason, but because Trump hates the community.
Michael Popok reports that KBJ calls out her brethren for "misunderstanding the assignment" when Trump files an emergency appeal, improperly picking "winner and losers" on cases that are not yet developed and ignoring the psychological and emotional harm to a fragile population in our society that needs protection, on his latest hot take. - 11/07/2025.
TommyT139
(2,092 posts)...applicable to so many cases these days (emphasis added):
As for the Governments suggestion that the President is harmed by not being able to impose a uniform definition of sex across various regulatory schemes, that assertion is just another species of the far-fetched contention that the President must be injured whenever he is prevented from doing as he wishes.
All of her dissent, which follows the scant four paragraphs of the majority, is worth a read.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25a319_i4dj.pdf
Rhiannon12866
(247,066 posts)SunSeeker
(57,267 posts)They are using it to stay rulings Trump doesn't like, with no showing of irreparable harm on the government's part. In the death penalty cases, the irreparable harm was obvious: the defendant would be put to death before having a chance to argue his case before the Supreme Court. Here, the Trump Administration will absolutely not suffer any permanent harm. On the contrary, it is the other side that will suffer permanent harm if the Trump administrations actions are not blocked. But the MAGA 6 don't care. They give Trump the stay of the lower court's adverse ruling 83% of the time! He loses in lower courts 90% of the time, but SCOTUS has become Trumps weapon against the rule of law.
We must expand the Court to 13 justices when Democrats are back in power.
Rhiannon12866
(247,066 posts)I'm just hoping that Alito and Thomas will hang in there until we're rid of TFG, we don't need more RW justices looking to last 40 years on the bench.
Deuxcents
(24,786 posts)I think Justice Jackson has an in depth analytical approach to these issues and her conclusions are so well presented after all the legalese (that I dont understand) is settled, is pertinent to our ever changing times and norms. Im starting to really appreciate her appointment.