Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Football

milestogo

(22,034 posts) Mon Oct 13, 2025, 04:53 PM Oct 13

Monday Night Football: Chicago Bears at Washington Commanders

Last edited Mon Oct 13, 2025, 08:46 PM - Edit history (1)

ABC

Also: Buffalo Bills at Atlanta Falcons

WHY ARE THERE TWO MONDAY NIGHT FOOTBALL GAMES?

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Monday Night Football: Chicago Bears at Washington Commanders (Original Post) milestogo Oct 13 OP

Monday night ICE ..........Washington at Chicago. twodogsbarking Oct 13 #1

The refs are totally stealing this game from the Bears. CanonRay Oct 13 #2

Turned it off, can't take it. CanonRay Oct 13 #3

As time expires... Morbius Oct 13 #4

Especially After Last Year's Fiasco ProfessorGAC Oct 14 #5

twodogsbarking

(16,277 posts)

1. Monday night ICE ..........Washington at Chicago.

Reply to milestogo (Original post)

Mon Oct 13, 2025, 06:15 PM

Oct 13

Hmmm.

CanonRay

(15,700 posts)

2. The refs are totally stealing this game from the Bears.

Reply to milestogo (Original post)

Mon Oct 13, 2025, 10:13 PM

Oct 13

Ridiculous penalties at ket moments.

CanonRay

(15,700 posts)

3. Turned it off, can't take it.

Reply to CanonRay (Reply #2)

Mon Oct 13, 2025, 10:50 PM

Oct 13

Morbius

(747 posts)

4. As time expires...

Reply to milestogo (Original post)

Mon Oct 13, 2025, 11:21 PM

Oct 13

Good guys 25, bad guys 24.

Not a well played game on either side, but it's a W. You take it.

ProfessorGAC

(74,889 posts)

5. Especially After Last Year's Fiasco

Reply to Morbius (Reply #4)

Tue Oct 14, 2025, 07:59 PM

Oct 14

Caleb should be 2-0 over Jayden.

Reply to this discussion