Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

usonian

(20,506 posts)
Mon Sep 15, 2025, 08:15 PM Monday

Total porn ban proposed by Michigan lawmakers. (Fox2, Detroit)

https://www.fox2detroit.com/news/total-porn-ban-proposed-michigan-lawmakers

adults and children.
Well, that solves the "age verification" problem.

Look up "unintended consequences" if you will.
Reminder, this is only a proposal, referred to committee.

LANSING, Mich. (FOX 2) - Michigan lawmakers proposed a bill last week banning porn.

House Bill 4938, called the "Anticorruption of Public Morals Act," would prohibit the distribution of "real, animated, digitally generated, written, or auditory" depictions of sexual acts. The bill breaks down the types of acts covered, including intercourse and masturbation.

The bill also includes a section that takes aim at transgender individuals by prohibiting material "that includes a disconnection between biology and gender by an individual of 1 biological sex imitating, depicting, or representing himself or herself to be of the other biological sex."

snip

The bill would require internet service providers in Michigan to use filters to prevent people from seeing the prohibited material.

If the bill were to become law, violators could be looking at prison time or hefty fines. Distributing the prohibited material or making it available online would carry a maximum prison sentence of 20 years and/or a $100,000 fine. If more than 100 pieces of prohibited material are involved, that penalty jumps to 25 years in prison and/or a fine up to $125,000.


What's next:

The bill was referred to the Committee on Judiciary.
No meetings have been scheduled for the committee to review the proposed law.
Perhaps some sessions to review material in question?

ETA: spirited discussion on Hacker News
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45255921
13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

marble falls

(68,576 posts)
5. Right. I don't care for porn, so I don't go looking for it. Besides the SCOTUS won't permit that law ...
Mon Sep 15, 2025, 08:40 PM
Monday

... it's ruled against it many times.

usonian

(20,506 posts)
9. Every accusation is a confession.
Mon Sep 15, 2025, 09:25 PM
Monday

I grew up Catholic. You probably did, too. (Irish Dem? sure).

And you know the consequences of their policies.

Irish_Dem

(74,848 posts)
10. Yep MAGA cult is highly repressed.
Mon Sep 15, 2025, 09:30 PM
Monday

And acts it out all the time.

Ha yes raised Catholic. What else in an Irish family.

Deuxcents

(24,015 posts)
11. I remember the Moral Majority tried this years ago and found out ya can't legislate morality
Mon Sep 15, 2025, 10:26 PM
Monday

We used to say the moral majority is not moral or the majority

usonian

(20,506 posts)
12. Churches found long ago that mandated morality is a means of control.
Mon Sep 15, 2025, 10:59 PM
Monday

One of many. But the leaders are exempt. No need to give examples.

Every accusation is a confession. Good people are enablers, uplifters and examples.

Small shits want to control, cut down and be exempt from all rules (OK, "privilege" )

Never changes.

bucolic_frolic

(52,406 posts)
13. The sponsors want to restrict porn so they are the only ones who can see it
Tue Sep 16, 2025, 06:32 AM
Tuesday

In the name of regulation, of course!

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Civil Liberties»Total porn ban proposed b...