Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Civil Liberties
Related: About this forumNEWS: Paul Clement tells the court that two WilmerHale attorneys had their security clearances pulled under the Trump EO
Chris Geidner
@chrisgeidner.bsky.social
Follow
NEWS: Paul Clement tells the court that two WilmerHale attorneys had their security clearances pulled under the Trump executive order targeting the firm. (Note: This is not violating the TRO, which did not enjoin the clearances part of the executive order.)
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.278933/gov.uscourts.dcd.278933.109.0_1.pdf
May 13, 2025
VIA ECF
The Honorable Richard J. Leon
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
333 Constitution Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20001
Re: Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP v. Executive Office of the
President, No. 1:25-cv-917-RJL (D.D.C.)
Dear Judge Leon:
I write to inform the Court of a recent development that pertains to the abovereferenced matter. On May 9, 2025, two WilmerHale attorneys received letters from a
government agency informing them that their security clearances have been suspended
pursuant to Executive Order 14250, Addressing Risks from WilmerHale (the Executive
Order).1
This development underscores that the Executive Branch stands ready and willing
to implement the Executive Order absent judicial intervention. It also underscores the need
for any permanent relief this Court may grant not only to restrain future implementation of
the Executive Order, but also to redress actions already taken pursuant to it. Accordingly,
WilmerHale respectfully requests that, if the Court enjoins enforcement of the Executive
Order, the Court specifically direct Defendants to (1) nullify and reverse any and all
suspensions or revocations of WilmerHale personnels security clearances that have been
made pursuant to the Executive Order; (2) cease any and all reviews of WilmerHale
personnels security clearances initiated pursuant to the Executive Order; and (3) nullify,
reverse, and/or cease any other actions that may have been taken pursuant to the Executive
Order.
Respectfully,
s/Paul D. Clement
Paul D. Clement
Counsel for Plaintiff
ALT
May 13, 2025 at 8:14 PM
@chrisgeidner.bsky.social
Follow
NEWS: Paul Clement tells the court that two WilmerHale attorneys had their security clearances pulled under the Trump executive order targeting the firm. (Note: This is not violating the TRO, which did not enjoin the clearances part of the executive order.)
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.278933/gov.uscourts.dcd.278933.109.0_1.pdf
May 13, 2025
VIA ECF
The Honorable Richard J. Leon
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
333 Constitution Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20001
Re: Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP v. Executive Office of the
President, No. 1:25-cv-917-RJL (D.D.C.)
Dear Judge Leon:
I write to inform the Court of a recent development that pertains to the abovereferenced matter. On May 9, 2025, two WilmerHale attorneys received letters from a
government agency informing them that their security clearances have been suspended
pursuant to Executive Order 14250, Addressing Risks from WilmerHale (the Executive
Order).1
This development underscores that the Executive Branch stands ready and willing
to implement the Executive Order absent judicial intervention. It also underscores the need
for any permanent relief this Court may grant not only to restrain future implementation of
the Executive Order, but also to redress actions already taken pursuant to it. Accordingly,
WilmerHale respectfully requests that, if the Court enjoins enforcement of the Executive
Order, the Court specifically direct Defendants to (1) nullify and reverse any and all
suspensions or revocations of WilmerHale personnels security clearances that have been
made pursuant to the Executive Order; (2) cease any and all reviews of WilmerHale
personnels security clearances initiated pursuant to the Executive Order; and (3) nullify,
reverse, and/or cease any other actions that may have been taken pursuant to the Executive
Order.
Respectfully,
s/Paul D. Clement
Paul D. Clement
Counsel for Plaintiff
ALT
May 13, 2025 at 8:14 PM
NEWS: Paul Clement tells the court that two WilmerHale attorneys had their security clearances pulled under the Trump executive order targeting the firm. (Note: This is not violating the TRO, which did not enjoin the clearances part of the executive order.) storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
— Chris Geidner (@chrisgeidner.bsky.social) 2025-05-14T00:14:45.910Z
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

NEWS: Paul Clement tells the court that two WilmerHale attorneys had their security clearances pulled under the Trump EO (Original Post)
mahatmakanejeeves
May 13
OP
LetMyPeopleVote
(163,402 posts)1. WilmerHale Says Attorney Clearances Suspended Under Trump Order
This action is clearly illegal
WilmerHale Says Attorney Clearances Suspended Under Trump Order
— The TrumpRussiaGuide ðºð¸ðºð¦ (@trumprussiaties.bsky.social) 2025-05-14T14:27:15.665Z
news.bloomberglaw.com/business-and...
Link to tweet
https://news.bloomberglaw.com/business-and-practice/wilmerhale-says-attorney-clearances-suspended-under-trump-order
Lawyers for WilmerHale said in a court filing Tuesday that two of the law firms attorneys were told by a government agency their security clearances were suspended as a result of President Donald Trumps executive order against the firm.
The unnamed agency alerted the lawyers to the action on May 9, the WilmerHale lawyers said in a letter to US District Judge Richard Leon. The letter asked Leon to include in any future order a provision that would nullify and reverse any suspension or revocation of its security clearances pursuant to the order.
This development underscores that the executive branch stands ready and willing to implement the executive order absent judicial intervention, Paul Clement, a partner at Clement & Murphy who represents WilmerHale, wrote.
The judge is weighing arguments from the firm to permanently enjoin the government from enforcing the order, which Trump issued March 27. The order cited the firms former partner, Robert Mueller, who it accused of weaponization of government for leading the Russia investigation.
The unnamed agency alerted the lawyers to the action on May 9, the WilmerHale lawyers said in a letter to US District Judge Richard Leon. The letter asked Leon to include in any future order a provision that would nullify and reverse any suspension or revocation of its security clearances pursuant to the order.
This development underscores that the executive branch stands ready and willing to implement the executive order absent judicial intervention, Paul Clement, a partner at Clement & Murphy who represents WilmerHale, wrote.
The judge is weighing arguments from the firm to permanently enjoin the government from enforcing the order, which Trump issued March 27. The order cited the firms former partner, Robert Mueller, who it accused of weaponization of government for leading the Russia investigation.