I'm sure you're joking, because there's no way in Hell that someone in charge of a major investigation would be so breathtakingly stupid as to testify about it in public.

Response to Ocelot II (Reply #11)

Chin music This message was self-deleted by its author.

Ocelot II

(131,226 posts)

14. I know it won't be Garland.

Reply to Chin music (Reply #13)

Mon Jun 27, 2022, 07:35 PM

Jun 2022

Response to Ocelot II (Reply #14)

Chin music This message was self-deleted by its author.

Captain Zero

(8,952 posts)

19. It's more likely he announces his retirement effective in 3 months

Reply to Chin music (Reply #1)

Thu Jul 7, 2022, 04:51 AM

Jul 2022

Then the Senate Republicans refuse to vote on a new AG.

rurallib

(64,833 posts)

2. even more fun if she answered questions honestly

Reply to JoeOtterbein (Original post)

Mon Jun 27, 2022, 06:41 PM

Jun 2022

now that would be a fireworks display

JoeOtterbein

(7,875 posts)

9. Good point!

Reply to rurallib (Reply #2)

Mon Jun 27, 2022, 07:23 PM

Jun 2022

That would be fun!

agingdem

(8,958 posts)

3. don't think so..

Reply to JoeOtterbein (Original post)

Mon Jun 27, 2022, 06:42 PM

Jun 2022

the talk is about security..don't think any of Trump's army of marauding idiots would threaten her...she's one of them...

JoeOtterbein

(7,875 posts)

10. I saw that about security and thought...

Reply to agingdem (Reply #3)

Mon Jun 27, 2022, 07:24 PM

Jun 2022

...she would expect high security.

agingdem

(8,958 posts)

12. Diva wannabes generally do...

Reply to JoeOtterbein (Reply #10)

Mon Jun 27, 2022, 07:29 PM

Jun 2022

what could she possible add to the conversation the committee doesn't already know?..

agingdem

(8,958 posts)

4. she won't testify unless she's subpoenaed

Reply to JoeOtterbein (Original post)

Mon Jun 27, 2022, 06:47 PM

Jun 2022

and do you really want to hear her justify her sedition shit?... how about raiding her home and seizing her electronic devices...that would make me happy...

hlthe2b

(114,680 posts)

5. She'd make it a ridiculous spectacle--just like Bannon would have.

Reply to JoeOtterbein (Original post)

Mon Jun 27, 2022, 06:51 PM

Jun 2022

So, I can't imagine they'd risk a public hearing with her.

JohnSJ

(98,883 posts)

8. I doubt it. No way will they put someone as unreliable as Thomas to testify, because the odds are

Reply to JoeOtterbein (Original post)

Mon Jun 27, 2022, 07:02 PM

Jun 2022

see would push the big lie

drray23

(8,821 posts)

16. I am thinking Mo Brooks

Reply to JoeOtterbein (Original post)

Mon Jun 27, 2022, 08:33 PM

Jun 2022

he got screwed by Trump after all that he did pre Jan 6. He was even one of the speakers that day.
He went on to lose his primary and he is pissed. I would not be surprised if he had decided to retaliate by spilling the beans.

JoeOtterbein

(7,875 posts)

17. Interesting...

Reply to drray23 (Reply #16)

Mon Jun 27, 2022, 09:50 PM

Jun 2022

...and good guess. I can't wait!

LoisB

(13,479 posts)

18. That is a good guess.

Reply to drray23 (Reply #16)

Mon Jun 27, 2022, 09:53 PM

Jun 2022

Reply to this discussion

Kick in to the DU tip jar?

This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.

As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.