SCOTUS declines to hear Rep Mike Kelly's mail voting case appeal

[DeminPennswoods]

Today SCOTUS unanimously declined to hear Mike Kelly's appeal to declare mail/absenteel voting in PA illegal.

https://www.timesonline.com/story/news/politics/2021/02/22/us-supreme-court-refuses-hear-us-rep-mike-kellys-voting-case/4538522001/

[MyOwnPeace]

1. Love EVERY TIME

Mike Kelly gets kicked in the teeth - couldn't happen to a better guy!

[DeminPennswoods]

2. SCOTUS dragged the case out, too

by not dismissing it right away, giving Kelly false hope they'd hear it when they never had any intention of doing so. They sucker punched him. LOL!

[MyOwnPeace]

7. Just heard the NBC guy

say that they had received the case in October, apparently decided not to interfere with the election (more 'respect' for the election than tRump had!), then the challenges, then the impeachment, so now it was OK to 'release' their decision.....

Yeah, LOVE the thought of Kelly 'thinking' he had a chance!

[DeminPennswoods]

8. Maybe we should show these conservative judges a little love

from time to time...

[MyOwnPeace]

9. Now is not the time to go 'nice' on them......

you KNOW that they're gonna' come back soon with some judgment that will leave us doing this:

[DeminPennswoods]

10. True, but positive reinforcement can't hurt, right?

[dchill]

6. Oh, absolutely!

[FakeNoose]

3. Why should SCOTUS listen to this ridiculous case?

It's just GQP bitching - that's all it is. Act 77 was not "unconstitutional" and neither was the mail-in balloting. Everything was handled in accordance to our state voting regulations. Every Pennsylvania voter had the opportunity to vote legally via mail-in ballot. The fact that Republicans DIDN'T do so is irrelevant. It was legal and constitutional.

Mike Kelly has no case, he's trying to waste the court's time.

[DeminPennswoods]

4. That's why they declined to hear Kelly's appeal

nt

[MyOwnPeace]

5. But he DOES have a case......

and it's MENTAL!