Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(137,429 posts)
Mon May 11, 2026, 08:35 PM May 11

I told the Supreme Court what would happen if it ruled against Louisiana's map. And I was right

Janai S. Nelson

In W.E.B. Du Bois’ book of history “Black Reconstruction,” about the broken promises of emancipation and the decades of terror that followed the withdrawal of federal troops that had been sent to protect the South’s freedmen, that period of American history is distilled into a single devastating sentence: “The slave went free; stood a brief moment in the sun; then moved back again toward slavery.”

I argued the Louisiana v. Callais case before the U.S. Supreme Court on behalf of Black voters.


In October, I argued the Louisiana v. Callais case before the U.S. Supreme Court on behalf of Black voters in Louisiana. My argument was simple: Louisiana had denied Black voters a fair chance at electing representatives of their choosing by deliberately “packing and cracking” them across congressional districts. The map that remedied this discrimination was both constitutional and legally required.

The Supreme Court’s conservative majority disagreed. Its 6-3 decision, rendered at the end of April, reminds us that Du Bois was not just writing about one chapter of history. He was observing a pattern that has come to define Black Americans’ long struggle for civil rights in America: short bursts of progress followed by long periods of setbacks and retrenchment. Expansion of rights followed by efforts to claw them back. Moments of hope followed by massive betrayal.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/told-supreme-court-happen-ruled-172107108.html
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I told the Supreme Court what would happen if it ruled against Louisiana's map. And I was right (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin May 11 OP
wasn't too hard to predict what that racist motherfucking court would do, actually, though I applaud her effort LymphocyteLover May 12 #1
INDEED. Though for me the ruling wasn't a surprise because I'd figured the six out for who/what they are long ago, and B.See Yesterday #2

LymphocyteLover

(10,151 posts)
1. wasn't too hard to predict what that racist motherfucking court would do, actually, though I applaud her effort
Tue May 12, 2026, 07:47 AM
May 12

B.See

(8,863 posts)
2. INDEED. Though for me the ruling wasn't a surprise because I'd figured the six out for who/what they are long ago, and
Tue May 19, 2026, 04:09 AM
Yesterday

this was the Republican endgame all along. They'd been building the notion that redistricting resulting in Black voter disenfranchisement 'wasn't discrimination' if 'the intent' wasn't racial, even if it results in disenfranchisement. They've been building that bs argument for quite awhile now.

Like the attack on women's abortion rights, GOP/MAGA undermining is incremental and underhanded. BTW, They'll be ruling out contraceptives next.

AND birthright citizenship. Even for non-immigrants who long thought themselves (ourselves) as Americans.

So, remember where you (all) read it.

Kick in to the DU tip jar?

This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.

As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.

Tell me more...

Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»I told the Supreme Court ...