Welcome to DU!
    The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
    Join the community:
    Create a free account
    Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
    Become a Star Member
    Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
    All Forums
        Issue Forums
        Culture Forums
        Alliance Forums
        Region Forums
        Support Forums
        Help & Search
    
Lawsuits against banks with Epstein ties may shed new light on financier's crimes
Experts say claim banks enabled Epstein will be difficult to prove but other outcomes could provide solace to victims(snip)
These lawsuits, filed by an anonymous plaintiff against Bank of America and the Bank of New York Mellon (BNY), allege that these financial powerhouses illicitly enabled Epsteins sex trafficking. The suits are helmed by Sigrid S McCawley, of Boies Schiller Flexner, and Brad Edwards of Edwards Henderson, who have long represented Epstein victims.
Epstein committed these crimes by means of not only his own extraordinary wealth and power, but through access to funding and financial support from both individuals and institutions, including BNY, one lawsuit claims. Egregiously, BNY had a plethora of information regarding Epsteins sex trafficking operation but chose profit over protecting the victims.
The Bank of America suit echoes these allegations, claiming the institution knowingly provided the financial support and the veneer of institutional legitimacy for Epstein and his co-conspirators to fuel their international sex trafficking organization under the guise of non-criminal business activities. The suit also said Bank of America neglected to file suspicious activity reports.
(snip)
The lawsuits have the potential to reveal more information about the ongoing Epstein saga, Faddis said. Even though there have been sort of walls put up at every turn for folks seeking this information, when theres a lawsuit, theres a discovery process, and that discovery process often requires disclosure of information that was not previously public.
(snip)
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/oct/27/jeffrey-epstein-lawsuit-us-banks
					
						2 replies
						
							 = new reply since forum marked as read
						
					
     
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
  = new reply since forum marked as read
						
					
     
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
					
				
				 = new reply since forum marked as read
						
					
     
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
  = new reply since forum marked as read
						
					
     
					
						Highlight:
						NoneDon't highlight anything
						5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
					
				
						Lawsuits against banks with Epstein ties may shed new light on financier's crimes (Original Post)
						Uncle Joe
						Monday
						OP
					
      
      
      
      
Irish_Dem
(77,009 posts)1. Why would upstanding powerhouse banks fund a child sex ring?
        slightlv
(6,943 posts)2. Profit... and an "in" with those in Power (to be used at a date of their choosing).
        They sure didn't care about the girls. After all, trump made it a boon to disappear all those migrant children, mostly girls, in the middle of the night. Never to be heard from again. I better not ever hear anyone say America is better than any of the Middle Eastern countries. America treats its females... regardless of age... with the same indignity as found in any of the Islamic countries. And it is no more "Christian" than it is "Islamic"... its just pure evil operating under guise and behest of Power.


