Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(123,718 posts)
Fri May 16, 2025, 03:41 PM May 16

Harrop: Democrats' battles over age ignore age of electorate

By Froma Harrop / Creators.com

Democrats are deep in debate over the age of their older leaders. Some need replacement, according to younger Democrats who want to replace them. And in some cases, they are right.

But these arguments turn toxic when they equate age with capability. Ageism is bad politics, especially when you look at the age of the electorate.

David Hogg, vice chair for the Democratic National Committee, angered many party members with his call to primary older Democratic incumbents in safe districts. The 25-year-old made no distinction between physically fit elder statesmen and others who have shown obvious mental decline.

James Carville, the brains behind Bill Clinton’s presidential wins, hit back. He said the DNC should sue the young man and called Hogg “a contemptible little twerp.”

https://www.heraldnet.com/opinion/harrop-democrats-battles-over-age-ignore-age-of-electorate/

I'd be fine of both of them went away.

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Harrop: Democrats' battles over age ignore age of electorate (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin May 16 OP
Carville's ad hominem attack is not helpful. Nt spooky3 May 16 #1
I agree. And neither were Hogg's attacks. Scrivener7 May 16 #2
NOT just according to younger voters Skittles May 16 #3
Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»Harrop: Democrats' battle...