Signalgate explains a lot about why it's come to this
By David Brooks / The New York Times
If a single moment of mind-boggling incompetence could demonstrate the signature flaw of this administrations first 100 days, it would be the day some of the highest officials in our nation started sending war plans to Jeffrey Goldberg of The Atlantic via a Signal chat.
If you create an organization in which everybody has to flatter the ruling narcissist, then stupidity will be the result. If you appoint TV hosts to key government positions, then stupidity will be the result. If you ignore expert opinion left, right and center on tariffs, constitutional safeguards, policy toward Ukraine and much else then stupidity will be the result. If all the members of the administration know they have to suppress unpleasant facts because the narcissist in chief regards unpleasant advice as disloyalty, then stupidity will most surely be the result.
I have to confess, administration officials are not incompetent at everything. They are very good at figuring out where their leverage points are. They can control law firms by threatening their security clearance. They can control the nonprofit world by clawing back grants. If they can control the Department of Treasury payments system, they can control the financial lifeblood that flows through agency after agency.
So they possess a kind of destructive genius. But when it comes time for normal policymaking, improving peoples lives, we are being ruled by people who just dont know what they are doing.
https://www.heraldnet.com/opinion/brroks-signalgate-explains-a-lot-about-why-its-come-to-this/

Walleye
(40,492 posts)Irish_Dem
(69,861 posts)They are interested only in power, control, wealth for themselves.
BootinUp
(49,825 posts)Lesser known Chat app.
tonkatoy8888
(93 posts)You know it's time to stop drinking when you agree with David Brooks about anything.
I will, however, admit that I haven't read the entire article yet. I'm sure when I do there will be the obligatory paragraph letting readers know that the Democrats, if in power, would be just as bad or in some oblique, unstated way worse than the Republicans.