Gallup will no longer measure presidential approval after 88 years
Source: The hill
Gallup will no longer track presidential approval ratings after more than eight decades doing so, the public opinion polling agency confirmed to The Hill on Wednesday. The company said starting this year it would stop publishing approval and favorability ratings of individual political figures, saying in a statement it reflects an evolution in how Gallup focuses its public research and thought leadership.
Our commitment is to long-term, methodologically sound research on issues and conditions that shape peoples lives, a spokesperson for the agency said. That work will continue through the Gallup Poll Social Series, the Gallup Quarterly Business Review, the World Poll, and our portfolio of U.S. and global research. The Gallup Presidential Approval Rating has for decades been the among the top barometers cited by media outlets measuring public opinion of the presidents performance.
President Trump has seen his rating by the agency slip in recent months, peaking at 47 percent last February and dipping to less than 37 percent in its last poll taken in December. This change is part of a broader, ongoing effort to align all of Gallups public work with its mission, a spokesperson for Gallup said. We look forward to continuing to offer independent research that adheres to the highest standards of social science.
When asked by The Hill if Gallup had received any feedback from The White House or anyone in the current administration before making the decision, the spokesperson said, this is a strategic shift solely based on Gallups research goals and priorities. Trumps Gallup approval rating as of last December was among the lowest the organization had found since it began taking the poll in the 1930s.
Read more: https://thehill.com/homenews/media/5733236-gallup-stops-presidential-approval-ratings-polls/
UpInArms
(54,494 posts)Would sure hate to see something happen to it
Roy Rolling
(7,529 posts)ETTD
SheltieLover
(78,518 posts)electric_blue68
(26,477 posts)gopiscrap
(24,606 posts)SheltieLover
(78,518 posts)gopiscrap
(24,606 posts)SheltieLover
(78,518 posts)SheltieLover
(78,518 posts)electric_blue68
(26,477 posts)SheltieLover
(78,518 posts)Volaris
(11,535 posts)SheltieLover
(78,518 posts)Vapors...
Hey Joe
(513 posts)SheltieLover
(78,518 posts)LoisB
(12,609 posts)wolfie001
(7,391 posts)They have no lowest level on which they will debase themselves for the cult fuhrer. Nasty pigs.
Initech
(108,077 posts)wolfie001
(7,391 posts)pnwmom
(110,220 posts)poli-junkie
(1,514 posts)riversedge
(80,101 posts)yaesu
(9,138 posts)KPN
(17,217 posts)this conforms it! These aren't people, they're parasites.
Ponietz
(4,232 posts)Volaris
(11,535 posts)To remember just HOW spineless they are when they start complaining about tax hikes on Elon.
And to remind them constantly.
SheltieLover
(78,518 posts)Ritabert
(2,170 posts)dweller
(28,020 posts)The horse head in the bed moment
Gallup gallop galumph
😑
✌🏻
generalbetrayus
(1,615 posts)
dickthegrouch
(4,412 posts)Cannot possibly allow any negative reports anywhere. The voters cant be allowed to know the incompetence or even how many others feel that everything is going to hell.
BumRushDaShow
(167,377 posts)where it resulted in them predicting that Mitt Romney would win the 2012 election. After that, they ceased doing that particular poll.
I know I have posted a number of times in the past about that -
Romney 49%, Obama 48% in Gallup's Final Election Survey
Early voting so far breaks 49% for Obama and 48% for Romney
Gallup Editors
PRINCETON, NJ -- President Barack Obama and Republican challenger Mitt Romney are within one percentage point of each other in Gallup's final pre-election survey of likely voters, with Romney holding 49% of the vote, and Obama 48%. After removing the 3% of undecided voters from the results and allocating their support proportionally to the two major candidates, Gallup's final allocated estimate of the race is 50% for Romney and 49% for Obama.

The survey was conducted as part of Gallup Daily tracking Nov. 1-4.
(snip)
https://news.gallup.com/poll/158519/romney-obama-gallup-final-election-survey.aspx
And the mea culpa with a final analysis of what went wrong (PDF), where their partner USA Today officially dropped them as a partner after that, and Gallup no longer does this poll -
Martha T. Moore
USA TODAY
Published 2:24 p.m. E.T. June 4, 2013 | Updated 5:02 p.m. ET June 4, 2013
WASHINGTON Pollsters at Gallup said Tuesday they have identified flawed methods that contributed to their incorrect prediction that Mitt Romney would win the 2012 presidential election, but they are still working to determine how to better identify who is likely to vote.
The survey firm undertook a far-reaching review of its operations after its surveys came up short in the election: Gallup's final pre-election estimate showed Romney with 49% support to Obama's 48%, with a margin of error of +/-2%. Most polls estimated Obama would win the popular vote by 1 percentage point. Obama won the popular vote by 3.85 points.
In pre-election polling, Gallup consistently showed Romney with a 3-percentage point lead over Obama. When Gallup switched to surveying only "likely voters," Romney's edge increased to 4 percentage points.
Gallup, with researchers from the University of Michigan, will experiment with ways to better identify likely voters in surveys during the 2013 governor's races in New Jersey and Virginia. Gallup asks seven questions in its phone surveys to determine whether people are likely to vote a questionnaire that may rely too much on past voting and on how much "thought" voters have given to the election, Gallup Poll editor in chief Frank Newport said. Though all polling outfits showed an increase of support for Romney among likely voters vs. registered voters, Gallup's bump for Romney was the most extreme. "We really are re-evaluating that from square one," Newport said.
(snip)
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2013/06/04/gallup-poll-election-obama-romney/2388921/
There is too much "lying to the pollsters" (as well as "push-polling" ) and there is little hope in getting a true reading of how things stand nowadays.
hay rick
(9,483 posts)Most polling is a demonstration of the circular flow (clockwise in America) of opinions which are 1) created and disseminated by the media; 2) passively absorbed by consumers; and 3) regurgitated as answers to polls.
mopinko
(73,445 posts)Buddyzbuddy
(2,337 posts)Gallup, just close your doors. A polling company without the "appearance" of integrity is worthless.
SheltieLover
(78,518 posts)PatSeg
(52,655 posts)What a bizarre decision.
mdbl
(8,325 posts)They always asked stupidly, dumbed down questions to complex issues. Besides, Dump couldn't give shit what they say. He'll just call it fake.
twodogsbarking
(18,018 posts)FakeNoose
(40,826 posts)Wow, you could have fooled me!
LudwigPastorius
(14,396 posts)You had a good gallop, Gallup, but you're dead to me now.
RockRaven
(18,971 posts)Whoever runs Gallup is sure making it a contest.
Kid Berwyn
(23,737 posts)I mean, "cheap cowards."
pat_k
(12,859 posts)They already use party affiliation numbers that lag behind the reality -- that fail to capture the accelerating exodus from the Republican party.
If they corrected sampling to actual proportions of Independents, Dems, and Repubs at a specific slice in time-- not what they found when averaging findings from interviews conducted over the course of 2025 -- things would look so much worse for the regime.
The thing is, that steady 90% support among Republicans is actually bullshit because the proportion of self-identified Republicans in the population is shrinking, and that shrinkage hasn't been accounted for. And I think they know it.
Rather than fixing the models and dealing with the lawsuits and tantrums of even MORE abysmal numbers for the regime, they are opting out.
This is just my take. I have no proof or inside information, but I see a number of indicators that this is what's going on.
Bluetus
(2,510 posts)calls into question how either might be manipulated. So if they aren't going to measure essential information like this, what good is Gallup?
Zorro
(18,458 posts)They've probably seen the future and realized they won't be able to skew favorability polling results compared to what the reality is on the ground.
BTW James Carville's Super Bowl Sunday rant was a hoot to watch. He said the majority of people throughout the country now really, really hate Trump's guts and what he's done to the country. And I think he's right.
NBachers
(19,288 posts)regnaD kciN
(27,550 posts)they were measuring Trumps approval rating, and realized they lacked polling instruments precise enough to measure sub-atomic levels.
Easterncedar
(5,840 posts)For a polling organization, that's just a plain statement of open corruption.
George Orwell warned us.
legallyblondeNYC
(150 posts)ToxMarz
(2,815 posts)SheltieLover
(78,518 posts)DaBronx
(761 posts)Company suddenly forgets how to do math.
Leadership reports significant losses of moral compass. Execs received knee pads, several seen galloping to church confession.
rzemanfl
(31,261 posts)I will issue a rating every month. This month's is:
Too pissed at TSF to think about anyone approving the piece of shit-80%
Strongly disapprove-19%
So MAGAT that I will kill one of my children if they disagree-1%
patphil
(8,854 posts)I've not seen anyone reference a Gallup poll on any subject in quite a few years.
They're just making themselves more irrelevant than they already were.
Aristus
(71,905 posts)Someone should tell those fuckwits that no longer reporting on Presidential disapproval will not make it go away
sdfernando
(6,042 posts)when/if we have another Democratic President.
Rebl2
(17,547 posts)sure they were threatened. Thats what dictators do.
unblock
(56,096 posts)Hugely valuable as a research tool if exactly *because* it's been used and widely publish for 88 years. Moreover, massive amounts of research are built on top of this.
Frankly it's this mountain of research that makes it the crown jewel of poling. Who the hell knows exactly what "approval" really means? In the case of the current menace in the White House, it's obvious for any reasonable person to "disapprove". But in most cases, people are conflicted. They like some policies, dislike others, and even might like a politician as a person but dislike something they've done, etc.
But academics can tell you a thousand things that influence it, predict elections, etc.
All because it's been widely published and researched for ages.
Deeply suspicious that they want to end this. Very hard to believe this doesn't have anything to do with a threat from an administration. With a very, very underwater president in terms of "approval"....
femmedem
(8,548 posts)because their editorial board was about to endorse Harris.
snot
(11,598 posts)"issue...that shape{s} peoples lives"???
Wonder Why
(6,678 posts)BigmanPigman
(54,827 posts)Today's podcast.
Beacool
(30,510 posts)Everyone treats him like a mad king who must be appeased at all cost. Why??? Presidents are supposed to serve the people, not the other way around. It's ridiculous!!!
ancianita
(43,166 posts)If Dems win the presidency in 2028 & they start approval polls again, we'll have proof of their political bias. Which the oldest polling org with the biggest national sampling pool should not have.
