Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Polybius

(21,280 posts)
Wed Dec 3, 2025, 08:23 PM Wednesday

Hakeem Jeffries Praises Trump's Pardon of 'Beloved' Democrat: 'Exactly the Right Outcome'

Source: Mediaite

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) found a rare point of agreement with President Donald Trump on Wednesday, backing the president’s pardon of “beloved” Rep. Henry Cuellar (D-TX).

“One of the clearest examples of this was when Crooked Joe used the FBI and DOJ to “take out” a member of his own Party after Highly Respected Congressman Henry Cuellar bravely spoke out against Open Borders, and the Biden Border ‘Catastrophe,'” Trump wrote.

Cuellar was indicted in March 2024 for allegedly accepting hundreds of thousands of dollars in foreign bribes. Cuellar’s wife was also indicted at the time.

“Congressman Cuellar is a beloved member of the House of Representatives, loved in his community, particularly in Laredo. I’ve had the opportunity to spend time with him down in Laredo in South Texas,” Jeffries said on Wednesday. “I look forward to that moving forward. Listen, the reality is this indictment was very thin to begin with, in my view. The charges were eventually going to be dismissed, if not at the trial court level then by the Supreme Court, as they’ve repeatedly done in instances just like this.”

Read more: https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/hakeem-jeffries-praises-trump-pardon-171507006.html

22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hakeem Jeffries Praises Trump's Pardon of 'Beloved' Democrat: 'Exactly the Right Outcome' (Original Post) Polybius Wednesday OP
Beloved bribes IronLionZion Wednesday #1
Apparently in this particular circumstance, Jeffries doesn't mind it either. choie Wednesday #5
Yeah. WTF is with Jeffries? mdbl Wednesday #8
Disappointing Buzz cook Wednesday #2
Why would Jefferies support pardoning a corrupt Democrat? Nt Fiendish Thingy Wednesday #3
Perhaps AIPAC? They are both supporters of Israel. Intractable Wednesday #10
Jesus H. Christ. choie Wednesday #4
Hmm, hesitated to endorse Mamdani, the Democratic peoples choice Buddyzbuddy Wednesday #6
So his Pedophile Protection Program quip was LuvLoogie Wednesday #7
Mayor Mamdani Prairie Gates Wednesday #9
My faith in Jeffries is approaching my faith in Schumer. Grins Wednesday #11
Yep MustLoveBeagles 12 hrs ago #21
wow. nt berniesandersmittens Wednesday #12
Sigh... Marie Marie Wednesday #13
Just more evidence that the only thing the old guard cares about is seats Bluetus Wednesday #14
Post removed Post removed Wednesday #15
Huh. This is actually something that Trump *may* have somewhat right, at least AFA the timeline goes AZJonnie Yesterday #16
One bad misstatement. He does NOT need to prove anything. It's up to the Wonder Why 13 hrs ago #18
Since I'm often a stickler for language in this same way, I stipulate to the greater accuracy AZJonnie 13 hrs ago #19
Ughhhhh Celerity 18 hrs ago #17
WTAF. yardwork 12 hrs ago #20
Uh Huh Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin 5 hrs ago #22

IronLionZion

(50,539 posts)
1. Beloved bribes
Wed Dec 3, 2025, 08:26 PM
Wednesday

MAGA loves people who can be bought with bribes. Corruption and grift are encouraged.

Buzz cook

(2,824 posts)
2. Disappointing
Wed Dec 3, 2025, 08:31 PM
Wednesday

Henry Cuellar is a crook. The democrats had a chance to replace him and they punted.

I though we were agreed that democratic crooks should get the same treatment as republican crooks.

choie

(6,488 posts)
4. Jesus H. Christ.
Wed Dec 3, 2025, 08:48 PM
Wednesday

Hakeem Jeffries praising the pardon of a corrupt public official, in essence rubber stamping trump's claim that the case against Cuellar was politically motivated.

Buddyzbuddy

(1,983 posts)
6. Hmm, hesitated to endorse Mamdani, the Democratic peoples choice
Wed Dec 3, 2025, 08:54 PM
Wednesday

but as soon as this guy in Texas is Pardoned by the Felon, free to commit future crimes if he so chooses, Jeffries has his back, just like that.
I'll leave it there.
I wonder what will happen when the list of Epstein predators that may include friends or donors comes out. When people talk about ending establishment politics and politicians, this is what they're talking about.


Grins

(9,177 posts)
11. My faith in Jeffries is approaching my faith in Schumer.
Wed Dec 3, 2025, 10:49 PM
Wednesday

And I’m an atheist.

Jeffries was relatively unknown when he moved up to #2 after to Pelosi. I was OK with him. Now I have doubts.

Bluetus

(2,064 posts)
14. Just more evidence that the only thing the old guard cares about is seats
Wed Dec 3, 2025, 11:38 PM
Wednesday

And they simply cannot understand the party has to stand for the right things if we are ever going to return to a real governing majority. Even with the wildest sweep imaginable in 2026, we would be nowhere near a governing majority.

The most optimistic number I have seen are something like 235-200 in the House and maybe 51-49 in the Senate.

That might give some governing ability in the House. it certainly would allow committees to provide some meaningful checks and balances. But that 235 probably would include 50 who would be very difficult to get with any progressive legislation.

And a 51-49 majority in the Senate just means that we would still be 15 votes away from killing the filibuster, and we would constantly be dealing with people like Fetterman and Gillibrand who would soak that thin margin for all it is worth.

Boosting Cuellar is the last thing Democrats should be doing if they want to build a governing majority over the next generation.

Response to Polybius (Original post)

AZJonnie

(2,483 posts)
16. Huh. This is actually something that Trump *may* have somewhat right, at least AFA the timeline goes
Thu Dec 4, 2025, 01:43 AM
Yesterday
Cuellar was already a long‑time border hawk, but he did turn up the volume noticeably in the first year of Biden’s term, i.e., in the window leading up to the 2022 raid.

His “mini‑crusade” before Biden
He was pressing hard on border security at least as far back as the 2014 child‑migrant surge, warning of a “crisis” and criticizing inaction under Obama.​

During Trump’s presidency he opposed the wall and some rhetoric, but still framed the border as a serious security issue and pushed for more resources and structured enforcement, so he was already somewhat off‑message from many national Democrats.​

After Biden’s inauguration (2021–early 2022)
In that first Biden year—i.e., before the January 2022 FBI raid—Cuellar became one of the most quoted Democratic critics on the border:

Spring 2021: He publicly contradicted Biden’s claim that the border was “under control,” telling national outlets that it was not and warning about overcrowded facilities and “mixed messages” drawing migrants north.​

2021: He did repeated TV hits and interviews (CNN, NBC, local Texas media) urging tougher consequences, faster removals, and more visible enforcement, and warning Democrats that mishandling the border was a “recipe for disaster” politically.​

Compared to earlier periods, that 2021 stretch featured:
* More national‑TV exposure.
* More direct, public contradiction of a Democratic president’s talking points.
* More framing of the situation as a “crisis” his own party was mishandling.

So relative to his already long record, yes—Cuellar was particularly loud and nationally visible on border policy between Biden’s inauguration (Jan 2021) and the visible start of the federal investigation (the January 2022 raid), even though his underlying views on enforcement were consistent with what he’d been saying since at least 2014


I mean, I also read the case was pretty strong against him, but even as a staunch defender of Biden, I have to admit, the timing was a little suss

And you know what? In this sense, Cuellar was right: "and warning Democrats that mishandling the border was a “recipe for disaster” politically.​". Now we have Trump again. And I can pretty well guarantee you Biden's allowing so very many people into the country during his term was a tangible part of why Trump won again.

This all being said, Cuellar should have had to go to court, and been obliged to prove that he was not guilty of the charges. I cannot agree with Jeffries take here, even if I allow that it's not totally unreasonable to wonder whether or not he came into the DoJ's crosshairs due to his amped-up border rhetoric immediately before his house was raided. It doesn't change the question of whether or not the guy was guilty. That's only how things work in TRUMP'S mind. So Jeffries gave him exactly what he wanted. And that was a bullshit move.

Wonder Why

(6,444 posts)
18. One bad misstatement. He does NOT need to prove anything. It's up to the
Thu Dec 4, 2025, 12:40 PM
13 hrs ago

prosecution to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. And there are only two choices - proven guilty or not proven guilty.

AZJonnie

(2,483 posts)
19. Since I'm often a stickler for language in this same way, I stipulate to the greater accuracy
Thu Dec 4, 2025, 12:55 PM
13 hrs ago

to your statement vs mine. However my main point is that he still should've had his day in court, he should have faced the prosecutors attempt to prove him guilty.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Hakeem Jeffries Praises T...