Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(163,955 posts)
Fri Nov 28, 2025, 11:27 AM 8 hrs ago

More than 220 judges have now rejected the Trump admin's mass detention policy

Source: Politico

11/28/2025 07:00 AM EST


The Trump administration’s bid to systematically lock up nearly all immigrants facing deportation proceedings has led to a fierce — and mounting — rejection by courts across the country.

That effort, which began with an abrupt policy change by Immigration and Customs Enforcement on July 8, has led to a tidal wave of emergency lawsuits after ICE’s targets were arrested at workplaces, courthouses or check-ins with immigration officers. Many have lived in the U.S. for years, and sometimes decades, without incident and have been pursuing asylum or other forms of legal status.

At least 225 judges have ruled in more than 700 cases that the administration’s new policy, which also deprives people of an opportunity to seek release from an immigration court, is a likely violation of law and the right to due process. Those judges were appointed by all modern presidents — including 23 by Trump himself — and hail from at least 35 states, according to a POLITICO analysis of thousands of recent cases.

The number of judges opposing the administration’s position has more than doubled in less than a month. In contrast, only eight judges nationwide, including six appointed by Trump, have sided with the administration’s new mass detention policy.

Read more: https://www.politico.com/news/2025/11/28/trump-detention-deportation-policy-00669861

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
More than 220 judges have now rejected the Trump admin's mass detention policy (Original Post) BumRushDaShow 8 hrs ago OP
He doesn't need 220; he only needs six. Orrex 8 hrs ago #1
Indeed. A veneer of propriety. n/t yowzayowzayowza 6 hrs ago #2
So, who they gonna get to enforce these decisions? NotHardly 5 hrs ago #3
What's needed is this supreme court 6 to losse their power bluestarone 5 hrs ago #4

NotHardly

(2,368 posts)
3. So, who they gonna get to enforce these decisions?
Fri Nov 28, 2025, 02:16 PM
5 hrs ago
... gonna need some super hero, white knights, or some cops who still believe in the Constitution.

bluestarone

(20,893 posts)
4. What's needed is this supreme court 6 to losse their power
Fri Nov 28, 2025, 02:26 PM
5 hrs ago

How America can be destroyed by SIX FUCKING people is ridiculous. Hell our congress needs two thirds vote, ( i know that's 2/3 today but not right) why the fuck do these 6 assholes decide our democracy. We NEED 13 fucking judges.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»More than 220 judges have...