Full text of European counter-proposal to US Ukraine peace plan
Source: Reuters
Below is the text of a European counter-proposal to the United States' draft 28-point Ukraine peace plan, seen by Reuters on Sunday.
The counter-proposal, drafted by Europe's E3 powers of Britain, France and Germany, takes the U.S. plan as its basis but then goes through it point by point with suggested changes and deletions.
Read more: https://www.reuters.com/business/finance/full-text-european-counter-proposal-us-ukraine-peace-plan-2025-11-23/
The Madcap
(1,614 posts)See Point 27...
lamp_shade
(15,323 posts)Fiendish Thingy
(21,655 posts)It lays the groundwork for his Nobel Peace prize.
Unless you meant point #21, regarding giving up occupied territories.
The Madcap
(1,614 posts)Remember that anything Trump touches dies.
paleotn
(21,232 posts)to rearm? Absolutely not.
Put it in the circular file. There can be no way Russia gets out of this nearly unscathed. Not without regime change.
Fiendish Thingy
(21,655 posts)EU membership is in the plan, with Article 5-style security protection from the EU and the US.
NATO membership is not off the table.
Item #27 is designed to ensure Trumps approval, as it lays the groundwork for a Nobel Peace Prize.
AZ8theist
(7,002 posts)ESPECIALLY #27
Anything with Dotard as the "head" is doomed to failure.
Bayard
(27,959 posts)How can all these people continue to forget or dismiss that Russia invaded Ukraine? They started this damn war for no good reason other than Putin's greed and ego. Ukraine is the victim.
Why should Ukraine agree to limit weapons? Who is that supposed to serve? Is Russia told to limit theirs?
It sounds like there will be some reparations, but nothing about Russia getting the hell out of Ukraine--COMPLETELY. There should be no equivocation on that. Annexation is total crap for any country to pull (including the U.S.) Ukraine should not be bullied into giving up their land, by Russia, trump, or anyone else.
Still sounds like they want Ukraine to give up their minerals. No other country would agree to that with their own natural resources.
No nukes for Ukraine. Will Russia give up theirs? Ukraine was promised protection when they gave theirs up previously. Same old lies. If they hadn't given them up, Putin may not have tried to bust their door down this time.
Ukraine deserves and needs to be in NATO. Its not up to Putin. Stop letting him think he's in control of everything. Stop being afraid of him. "Robust guarantees," aren't worth didley. Neither does the, "expectation," that Russia won't invade its neighbors. Are you freakin' kidding me? It looks like the only reason other countries don't want Ukraine in NATO is that they are afraid Russia will come back again, and they'll actually have to live up to protecting each other.
I only see a couple of good things in this document. Ukraine is supposed to get their kidnapped kids back. I'm betting many will never be found, or have been fully indoctrinated by now.
I don't see anything about Russian officials being indicted for war crimes. I don't see where Ukraine's stolen land, including Crimea, is going to be returned. They are still treating them with kid gloves. Russia is broke, and they're military is busted. Its high time to put a boot on Putin's neck, or we'll be seeing the same thing again as soon as he can recoup.
I would really like to see Ukraine/Zelensky's wish list. It still doesn't look like they've had much input in what happens to their own country.
See this thread:
https://www.democraticunderground.com/132297224
Pres. Zelensky is entirely right in calling for justice, and not giving up their land.
niyad
(128,828 posts)maxsolomon
(37,944 posts)Ukraine commits not to recover its occupied sovereign territory through military means. Negotiations on territorial swaps will start from the Line of Contact.
Polybius
(21,229 posts)maxsolomon
(37,944 posts)Unfortunately, not a popular thing to say on DU.
FakeNoose
(39,661 posts)Putin won't give any territory, so why should he be allowed to take anything? When one country does all the taking, and the other country does all the giving, then you can't call it a "swap."
maxsolomon
(37,944 posts)that could create a logical, defensible border, for instance areas where Ukraine's forces are nearly surrounded, or natural borders like rivers.
Another possibility is to put infrastructure like nuclear power plants and hydroelectric dams back fully in Ukraine's control.
FakeNoose
(39,661 posts)I'm sure he'll die before he gives it back to its rightful owner ... Ukraine.
maxsolomon
(37,944 posts)Crimea was part of Russia from 1783 under Catherine the Great until 1954 when Kruschev's USSR "gave" it to the Ukraine SSR.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transfer_of_Crimea_to_Ukraine
This war is Revanchist at its core - Putin wants to restore the Russian Empire. Ukraine, esp Eastern Ukraine, is "Little Russia".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_Russia
The term Little Russia is now anachronistic when used to refer to the country Ukraine and the modern Ukrainian nation, its language, culture, etc. Such usage is typically perceived as conveying an imperialist view that the Ukrainian territory and people ("Little Russians"
It has continued to be used in Russian nationalist discourse, in which modern Ukrainians are presented as a single people in a united Russian nation. This has provoked new hostility toward and disapproval of the term by many Ukrainians. In July 2021 Vladimir Putin published a 7000-word essay, a large part of which was devoted to expounding these views.