In reversal, DOJ says Comey indictment was reviewed by full grand jury
Source: ABC News
November 20, 2025, 3:22 PM
In a reversal from what the Department of Justice represented in court and in written filings Wednesday, federal prosecutors said Thursday that the full grand jury reviewed the indictment of former FBI Director James Comey.
U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan, who brought the charges, testified Wednesday that the grand jury that indicted Comey voted to indict him on two of the three counts submitted in the original indictment, but that the final revised indictment reflecting the two counts Comey was ultimately charged with was not reviewed by the full grand jury -- only by the jury foreperson and one other grand juror. Comey's attorney, Michael Dreeben, argued Wednesday that the issue with the grand jury indictment clearly required the judge to throw out the case.
In court filings Thursday, DOJ officials reversed course. "The official transcript of the September 25, 2025, proceedings before Magistrate Judge Vaala conclusively refutes that claim and establishes that the grand jury voted on -- and true-billed -- the two-count indictment," prosecutors wrote in a filing.
Assistant U.S. Attorney Tyler Lemons had also attested in court Wednesday that the full grand jury did not see the final indictment. "Let me be clear that the second indictment, the operative indictment in this case that Mr. Comey faces, is a document that was never shown to the entire grand jury or presented in the grand jury room; is that correct?" U.S. District Judge Michael Nachmanoff asked. "Standing here in front of you, Your Honor, yes, that is my understanding," Lemons said.
Read more: https://abcnews.go.com/US/doj-halligan-slam-judge-comey-case-hearing/story?id=127709589

DISBAR.
elleng
(141,710 posts)bluestarone
(20,879 posts)can these stupid bastards continue?
moonshinegnomie
(3,776 posts)twodogsbarking
(16,967 posts)PJMcK
(24,492 posts)SHOW THE COURT THE TRANSCRIPT!
What? You cant?
Liars.
Miguelito Loveless
(5,368 posts)And ask them under oath if they saw the updated indictment.
C_U_L8R
(48,615 posts)Its all over except for the dismissal and the disbarment.
RockRaven
(18,488 posts)50 Shades Of Blue
(11,300 posts)Sneederbunk
(17,043 posts)Half-step
(112 posts)sinkingfeeling
(56,851 posts)mcar
(45,531 posts)Scruffy1
(3,477 posts)The only problem is they have no talent. They are not even good at their main forte: Lying. You would think Bondi would no something about prosecutions after 15 years as an assistant state attorney in Florida, even though states do not use Grand Juries as much as the feds I would think that some knowledge of federal practice would rub of since many face both state and federal indictments, but then maybe she had other talents on the job besides legal expertise. At any rate, she was dumb enough to do Trumps bidding and sent an insurance company lawyer to do a very well publicized case and is know trying to bail her sinking ship out. It will probably dawn on her that a pardon won't get her reputation or law license back. I'm sure she'll soon be on the rubbish heap soon and be trying to act like a victim. Mean while a grand jury is coming for Pulte and Bondi. It' like the Hindenburg burning if it only had the high Nazis on it. I need to get more corn chips and Queso.
nuxvomica
(13,804 posts)"Why can't you keep your story straight, like stronger, more competent people do?" This is how reporters should frame questions.
AverageOldGuy
(3,195 posts)refers every DOJ attorney for disbarment. Crucify a couple of them as a warning to the rest.