Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(163,895 posts)
Thu Nov 20, 2025, 07:15 PM Thursday

In reversal, DOJ says Comey indictment was reviewed by full grand jury

Source: ABC News

November 20, 2025, 3:22 PM


In a reversal from what the Department of Justice represented in court and in written filings Wednesday, federal prosecutors said Thursday that the full grand jury reviewed the indictment of former FBI Director James Comey.

U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan, who brought the charges, testified Wednesday that the grand jury that indicted Comey voted to indict him on two of the three counts submitted in the original indictment, but that the final revised indictment reflecting the two counts Comey was ultimately charged with was not reviewed by the full grand jury -- only by the jury foreperson and one other grand juror. Comey's attorney, Michael Dreeben, argued Wednesday that the issue with the grand jury indictment clearly required the judge to throw out the case.

In court filings Thursday, DOJ officials reversed course. "The official transcript of the September 25, 2025, proceedings before Magistrate Judge Vaala conclusively refutes that claim and establishes that the grand jury voted on -- and true-billed -- the two-count indictment," prosecutors wrote in a filing.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Tyler Lemons had also attested in court Wednesday that the full grand jury did not see the final indictment. "Let me be clear that the second indictment, the operative indictment in this case that Mr. Comey faces, is a document that was never shown to the entire grand jury or presented in the grand jury room; is that correct?" U.S. District Judge Michael Nachmanoff asked. "Standing here in front of you, Your Honor, yes, that is my understanding," Lemons said.

Read more: https://abcnews.go.com/US/doj-halligan-slam-judge-comey-case-hearing/story?id=127709589





DISBAR.
16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
In reversal, DOJ says Comey indictment was reviewed by full grand jury (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Thursday OP
Sorry, DoJ LIED. elleng Thursday #1
How in the fuck bluestarone Thursday #2
perjury moonshinegnomie Thursday #3
Usually they wait at least a week to re-write history. Geez. twodogsbarking Thursday #4
Okay, fine PJMcK Thursday #5
Summon the grand jurors Miguelito Loveless Friday #16
Were you lying then or are you lying now? C_U_L8R Thursday #6
The judge needs to get each and every grand juror under oath and ask them. RockRaven Thursday #7
I would not be surprised if the grand jurors have been threatened to support this version. 50 Shades Of Blue Thursday #10
They would only need one to lie. Sneederbunk Thursday #11
Let's find out Half-step Thursday #14
Can anyone in the DOJ spell 'incompetence'? sinkingfeeling Thursday #8
Oh well that's ok then mcar Thursday #9
They are like an unfunny Marx Brothers film. Scruffy1 Thursday #12
I would ask them: nuxvomica Thursday #13
I hope the judge involved . . . . AverageOldGuy Thursday #15

C_U_L8R

(48,615 posts)
6. Were you lying then or are you lying now?
Thu Nov 20, 2025, 07:28 PM
Thursday

It’s all over except for the dismissal and the disbarment.

Scruffy1

(3,477 posts)
12. They are like an unfunny Marx Brothers film.
Thu Nov 20, 2025, 09:28 PM
Thursday

The only problem is they have no talent. They are not even good at their main forte: Lying. You would think Bondi would no something about prosecutions after 15 years as an assistant state attorney in Florida, even though states do not use Grand Juries as much as the feds I would think that some knowledge of federal practice would rub of since many face both state and federal indictments, but then maybe she had other talents on the job besides legal expertise. At any rate, she was dumb enough to do Trumps bidding and sent an insurance company lawyer to do a very well publicized case and is know trying to bail her sinking ship out. It will probably dawn on her that a pardon won't get her reputation or law license back. I'm sure she'll soon be on the rubbish heap soon and be trying to act like a victim. Mean while a grand jury is coming for Pulte and Bondi. It' like the Hindenburg burning if it only had the high Nazis on it. I need to get more corn chips and Queso.

nuxvomica

(13,804 posts)
13. I would ask them:
Thu Nov 20, 2025, 09:45 PM
Thursday

"Why can't you keep your story straight, like stronger, more competent people do?" This is how reporters should frame questions.

AverageOldGuy

(3,195 posts)
15. I hope the judge involved . . . .
Thu Nov 20, 2025, 10:00 PM
Thursday

refers every DOJ attorney for disbarment. Crucify a couple of them as a warning to the rest.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»In reversal, DOJ says Com...