Federal judge orders Arlington, Fort Worth ISDs to remove Ten Commandments displays
Source: KERA Dallas, TX/NPR
Published November 18, 2025 at 4:32 PM CST
A federal judge on Tuesday ordered several Texas school districts to remove Ten Commandments displays from classrooms, issuing the ruling in a lawsuit brought by families who argue the postings violate the Constitutions ban on government-endorsed religion.
U.S. District Judge Orlando Garcia temporarily blocked 14 districts from enforcing Senate Bill 10, the new state law requiring public schools to display the biblical text in classrooms. Garcia wrote that it would be impractical, if not impossible to protect students from unwelcome religious displays without halting enforcement of the law.
The districts must remove the displays by Dec. 1, and the order will remain in effect while the case continues. This applies only to the districts named in the lawsuit, but the groups behind the case are urging all Texas school districts to avoid displaying the Ten Commandments.
Todays ruling is yet another affirmation of what Texans already know: The First Amendment guarantees families and faith communities not the government the right to instill religious beliefs in our children, said Chloe Kempf, attorney for the ACLU of Texas. Every school district in Texas is now on notice that implementing S.B. 10 violates their students constitutional rights.
Read more: https://www.keranews.org/texas-news/2025-11-18/texas-ten-commandments-sb10-schools
riversedge
(78,946 posts)OK to break the law. This law suit is so needed!!
azureblue
(2,631 posts)"Do as I say, not as I do."
I would say, sure put up the Ten. But only after leadership, from governor down to school principal, demonstrates they obey the ten. Especially the "do not lie" part.
malaise
(291,522 posts)Rec
rampartd
(3,215 posts)maybe a more effective way to teach values to kids is by example?
MayReasonRule
(3,988 posts)

Howdy from Caddo Parish
rampartd
(3,215 posts)i usually evacuate to shreveport when the wind stars blowing here in orleans.
MayReasonRule
(3,988 posts)My district would go back to being 'represented' by the Nazi turd that is Mikey Johnson.
Fascist fuck.
rampartd
(3,215 posts)democrats that might beat cassidy or fleming for senate : jon bel edwards? general honore?
MayReasonRule
(3,988 posts)
I wholeheartedly agree, those individuals each repeatedly demonstrated their ability and desire to transcend the delusionally malevolent abyss that surrounds the Y'all Qaeda Nat-C's within our state.
Given that it is literally impossible to reason with those that reject reason itself, their successes are truly achievements of the highest order.
Paladin
(32,110 posts)Fuck you, Abbott, Patrick and Paxton.
PJMcK
(24,497 posts)The first three are about worshipping an invisible deity. The next one is about obeying ones parents. The next four are about secular law and the last two are silly.
They do not constitute American law.
They were written by uneducated sheep herders who knew nearly nothing about the world.
They are specific to Judeo-Christian doctrines that should not be applied to people of other faiths. After all, the Constitution doesnt restrict religion but it doesnt enforce it, either.
These fundamentalists are not living in the real world of the 21st century.
Martin Eden
(15,223 posts)The next step is sermon and prayer, but in what denomination? Are Catholics included? What about Jews and Muslims? A district with a diverse population could mandate readings from the Talmud and Quran. Would fundy Christian parents like that?
Be careful what you wish for, putting religious instruction in public schools. If parental guidance and church attendance are insufficient to indoctrinate your children in religious belief, perhaps the problem lies elsewhere.
Trueblue Texan
(4,072 posts)But they're too short-sighted to realize they may not succeed in indoctrinating THEIR religion into youth.
Timeflyer
(3,545 posts)OldBaldy1701E
(9,687 posts)
MayReasonRule
(3,988 posts)
mwb970
(12,027 posts)They won't even know what half of them mean or are referring to. They certainly won't recognize the rules laid down by an imaginary, insecure "god" as anything they need to pay attention to.
LetMyPeopleVote
(173,289 posts)The Supreme Court already ruled against the Ten Commandments in classrooms. Thats why lawsuits against new Republican-imposed displays keep winning.
Republicans in several states keep trying to impose Ten Commandments displays on public school kids.
— Steve Benen (@stevebenen.com) 2025-11-19T19:12:20.750Z
Judges keep telling them, âYou can't do that.â
Take the latest case out of Texas, for example. www.ms.now/rachel-maddo...
https://www.ms.now/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/court-rejects-texas-law-requiring-display-ten-commandments-public-scho-rcna244778
In early August, a federal judge issued a preliminary injunction against a similar Arkansas law on Ten Commandments displays in schools.
Now Texas has joined the club. The New York Times reported:
A federal judge ordered some public school districts in Texas on Tuesday to remove Ten Commandment displays from their classroom walls by next month, a victory for families who had argued that the posters infringed on their religious freedom. The ruling from Judge Orlando L. Garcia applies to 14 public school districts, including ones in Fort Worth, Arlington and Conroe.
In his ruling, Garcia wrote that it is impracticable, if not impossible, to prevent plaintiffs from being subjected to unwelcome religious displays without stopping school districts from enforcing that law.
The ruling comes roughly three months after a different federal court reached the same conclusion in a related case filed by several Dallas-area families and faith leaders.......
So why would Republicans in several states take a step that the Supreme Court has already rejected? Its likely because theyre confident that the newly politicized high court and its dominant far-right majority will simply overturn the Stone precedent, doing fresh harm to the wall thats supposed to separate church and state in this country.
These GOP officials are almost certainly aware of the First Amendment, just as theyre almost certainly aware of the Supreme Court precedent that says they cannot legally do what theyre trying to do. But since the court has moved sharply to the right in the course of the last 45 years, GOP officials in Texas and others are counting on Republican-appointed justices to clear the way for more government-imposed religion in public schools.
That hasnt happened at least not yet which is why these state measures keep losing in court in the meantime.