Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

groundloop

(13,281 posts)
Sat Sep 20, 2025, 07:03 PM 13 hrs ago

Tulsi Gabbard did not alert White House before revoking 37 security clearances

Source: The Guardian

Tulsi Gabbard, the director of national intelligence, did not inform the White House that her office was revoking the security clearances of 37 people – including top deputies to the CIA director, John Ratcliffe – before it happened last month, according to three people familiar with matter.

The move caused consternation because it resulted in the White House not having an opportunity to closely vet the list before it became public and there appeared to be no paper trail from the president directing the effort, the people said.

As a result, officials only realized after the fact that Gabbard had managed to pull the security clearances of career CIA officials, at least one of whom was a top adviser to Ratcliffe and had worked on some of the US’s most sensitive military operations, the people said.

The list also included two Democratic congressional staffers – Maher Bitar, the national security adviser to senator Adam Schiff, and Thomas West, an aide on the Senate foreign relations committee – prompting fears the administration would be thrust into a messy separation-of-powers issue.

Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/sep/20/tulsi-gabbard-white-house-security-clearances

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Tulsi Gabbard did not alert White House before revoking 37 security clearances (Original Post) groundloop 13 hrs ago OP
Makes sense. Gabbard couldn't find anybody in the White House who knew f about security. erronis 13 hrs ago #1
Including herself lol nt Javaman 9 hrs ago #8
Prompting fears BOSSHOG 13 hrs ago #2
Well, Trump would have loved to see Democrats getting their clearances revoked muriel_volestrangler 13 hrs ago #3
Her boss is in Moscow. Harker 13 hrs ago #4
Absolutely. Putin was probably informed or done at the direction of Putin. Buddyzbuddy 11 hrs ago #6
Yeah, that's all they need. Turbineguy 13 hrs ago #5
The incompetence in this administration is breathtaking. ificandream 10 hrs ago #7

erronis

(21,314 posts)
1. Makes sense. Gabbard couldn't find anybody in the White House who knew f about security.
Sat Sep 20, 2025, 07:11 PM
13 hrs ago

While I'm in this mode, why does anybody include 'tulsi' while describing this POS? Gabbard works just fine. Maybe 'tulsi' is sort of cute...

BOSSHOG

(43,678 posts)
2. Prompting fears
Sat Sep 20, 2025, 07:12 PM
13 hrs ago

That more fucking incompetence will rear its head. Tom Homan? Trump 33 felonies? Epstein redux again? Murder on the high seas? Whining bitch hearing the truth? Tulsi fucking traitor gabbard? Billions of dollars of unsold soybeans? Tariffs suck just like Hoover taught us? Just can’t pull the lever for a black woman? Epstein again? And the band played on.

muriel_volestrangler

(104,743 posts)
3. Well, Trump would have loved to see Democrats getting their clearances revoked
Sat Sep 20, 2025, 07:25 PM
13 hrs ago

The only ones mentioned in this article that I can see that might have been questioned by Trump or any lackey are the "top deputies to the CIA director, John Ratcliffe" aka "at least one of whom was a top adviser to Ratcliffe and had worked on some of the US’s most sensitive military operations". Which may have been

In the days leading up to President Donald Trump’s Aug. 15 Alaska summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin, one of the CIA’s senior-most Russia experts worked grueling hours, helping Trump and his team prepare for high-stakes diplomacy over Ukraine and making sure they were adequately briefed, according to a former agency colleague.
Four days later, the CIA officer — whom The Washington Post is not naming for her protection — was at work at the spy agency’s Langley headquarters when she was abruptly ordered to report to the security office. She was informed that her clearance to look at classified material was being stripped. In a span of minutes, her 29-year career in public service was essentially over.
The officer had been expecting an imminent move to Europe to take up a prestigious assignment approved by CIA Director John Ratcliffe.
Instead, she became the latest casualty of a widening cull by Trump and Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, fueled at times by far-right activist Laura Loomer, targeting national security professionals whom they deem to have engaged in “politicization or weaponization of intelligence to advance personal, partisan, or non-objective agendas,” according to Gabbard’s Aug. 19 memo announcing the revocation at Trump’s direction of security clearances.

https://archive.ph/vkeGl
(Washington Post archive link)

The mention of Loomer is notable. She seems to have the power to get anyone fired, no matter if they seem pro-Trump, if she decides anything in their past doesn't pass her purity test. So if Gabbard can say "Loomer told me about these people", I'm sure she'll get credit for doing Loomer's bidding without bothering the White House.

Turbineguy

(39,364 posts)
5. Yeah, that's all they need.
Sat Sep 20, 2025, 07:38 PM
13 hrs ago

People who blow the whistle on the trump mob giving secrets to Putin's mob.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Tulsi Gabbard did not ale...