California Gov. Newsom signs bill aimed at banning law enforcement from using face coverings
Source: KCRA-TV Sacramento, CA
Updated: 11:47 AM PDT Sep 20, 2025
Gov. Gavin Newsom on Saturday signed legislation that aims to make California the first state to ban most law enforcement from covering their faces while carrying out operations.
Senate Bill 627, authored by Sen. Scott Wiener, D-San Francisco, was in response to federal immigration raids where officers have been seen wearing masks. It would prohibit neck gaiters, ski masks and other facial coverings for local and federal officers, including immigration enforcement agents, while they conduct official business. It makes exceptions for undercover agents, medical masks such as N95 respirators or tactical gear.
Republican lawmakers and law enforcement agencies were opposed to the bill, arguing it would make officers and agents job more dangerous. Immigration officials have cited the fear of agents and their families being doxed. Its unclear if California will be able to enforce the measure. Newsom also signed several other bills that his office argued would counter secret police tactics by the president and Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller.
The package of legislation would require that families be notified when immigration agents come on school campuses and require a judicial warrant or court order before giving student information or classroom access to ICE.
Read more: https://www.kcra.com/article/california-gov-newsom-signs-bill-banning-law-enforcement-from-using-face-coverings/67980150

SunSeeker
(56,730 posts)Chasstev365
(6,274 posts)One day these goons will be held responsible!
chowder66
(11,286 posts)"Democrats in Congress and lawmakers in several states, including Tennessee, Michigan, Illinois, New York, Massachusetts, and Pennsylvania, have also introduced similar proposals calling for mask bans for law enforcement officers."
https://abc7.com/post/california-bans-most-law-enforcement-officers-wearing-masks-during-operations/17856254/
Ponietz
(4,034 posts)flvegan
(65,277 posts)Yeah, that's what I thought.
Zero consequences, zero change.
I will say that it's good to see Newsom/CA pass this at any rate. It's a shame it was even needed.
Metaphorical
(2,521 posts)ICE agents still have to follow state laws, and they can be arrested by state law enforcement for breaking those laws.
It's pretty evident that Trump's Icestapo uses masks in order to prevent blowback for what are clearly illegal actions. If masks are needed, then a judge will need to sign a warrant for their use (thinking primarily tactical gear, in which an officer still needs to display their namebadge), so it really has little significant impact on local LEO. What it does do is to identify what amount to vigilantes and require them to follow the same requirements - and to restore at least a little bit of due process against Trump's vast overreach.
flvegan
(65,277 posts)True, but they don't seem to follow those laws.
But, tell you what, when state law enforcement starts arresting these guys for using masks on the regular, I will happily come back here and reply in all caps that I was wrong. And I do mean happily.
bluestarone
(20,320 posts)For awhile anyhow, so we'll see.
Bluetus
(1,556 posts)The problem now is that these goods are hard to identify positively. If ripping off the masks makes them identifiable, then perhaps they will be personally liable for their assaults and other extra-judicial acts.
This might cause many of them to drop out of ICE, or at least stop creaking the laws.
Plus it is a virtual certainly that many of these ICE thugs are already felons and I bet more than a few have outstanding warrants from previous crimes before they joined ICE. That would be a very good reason to keep their faces covered. And if they know they are likely to have their bare faces shown all over the Internet, they will suddenly decide ICE isn't really their calling after all.
intrepidity
(8,452 posts)The issue is broader than just face coverings, and in fact if another pandemic breaks out where facial masking becomes a big thing again, might this backfire somehow?
ETA: nevermind, just noticed it has exceptions for this.
markodochartaigh
(4,042 posts)If? I think that "when" is the appropriate conjunction.
chowder66
(11,286 posts)but citizens are being kidnapped, abused and in some instances killed and they don't know who is doing it.
There have been instances of criminals impersonating masked enforcement AND most (if any) agencies weren't wearing neck gators before the immigrant purge.... so SUCK IT UP.
progressoid
(51,951 posts)Why are no other law enforcement agencies worried about this?
chowder66
(11,286 posts)other jobs/careers.
red dog 1
(31,879 posts)I'm proud to say that he's my governor.
Magoo48
(6,612 posts)Cha
(314,411 posts)TY
JoseBalow
(8,416 posts)regardless of how it is subsequently adjudicated.
Buddyzbuddy
(1,492 posts)
FBaggins
(28,436 posts)Mask mandates were recommended by federal agencies - but had to be implemented by the states (which is why there were such variable requirements around the country)
(An exception being the federal workforce and/or on federal property)