Trump suggests Chicago is next for federal crime crackdown, followed by New York City

[BumRushDaShow]

Source: CBS News

August 22, 2025 / 2:29 PM EDT


Washington — President Trump on Friday said Chicago will probably be the federal government's next target for its anti-crime effort, following the ongoing operation in Washington, D.C., with New York City after that. The remarks were the president's clearest indication yet that he intends to bring his crusade against crime beyond the corridors of his direct authority in Washington. Mr. Trump also said he's willing to bring in the "regular military" into the District of Columbia, not just the National Guard, which would be a significant escalation of the president's use of the military on U.S. soil.

"I really am honored that the National Guard has done such an incredible job working with the police," Mr. Trump told reporters Friday. "And we haven't had to bring in the regular military, which we're willing to do if we have to. And after we do this, we'll go to another location, and we'll make it safe, also."

"Chicago's a mess," he continued. You have an incompetent mayor, grossly incompetent. And we'll straighten that one out probably next, that'll be our next one after this." He said "the people in Chicago" are "screaming for us to come."

"They're wearing red hats ... African American ladies, beautiful ladies, are saying, 'Please, President Trump, come to Chicago. Please.' I did great with the Black vote, as you know. And they want something to happen, so, I think Chicago will be our next, and then we'll help with New York." "When we're ready we'll go in and we'll straighten out Chicago, just like we did D.C.," the president added.

Read more: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-chicago-next-federal-law-enforcement-crime-then-new-york-city/

---

WHERE ARE THE EPSTEIN FILES??

[johnnyfins]

1. I really think all hell is about.to break loose.

[orangecrush]

17. Yup

[Bengus81]

21. 100% what TACO wants and why he's pulling this shit--for all hell to break loose.

[greatauntoftriplets]

2. I'm in Chicago and I don't have the Epstein files.

Go away, TACO, and take your ugly building with you.

[Chi67]

20. I'm in Chicago too

He better not even try it.

[Bayard]

3. Pshaw!

No one is begging him to come to Chicago. Can't wait to hear Gov. Pritzker's response.

[OldBaldy1701E]

22. I can't wait for Chicago's response!

[bucolic_frolic]

5. Making America safe for white collar crooks

one city at a time.

[AllaN01Bear]

6. hem. when we have one in the top office of the land .

[FakeNoose]

13. He's so full of shit and JB Pritzker already has his number

[no_hypocrisy]

7. How about New York?

https://m.

&pp=ygUnY2FzYWJsYW5jYSBjZXJ0YWluIHNlY3Rpb25zIG9mIG5ldyB5b3Jr

[electric_blue68]

15. Well, this NYC'r sez EFF Off, drumphf!

[Smilo]

8. Wonder why he is not talking about

Memphis, TN or St. Louis, Missouri a couple of states with high crime rates. Could it be because they are republican states? Nah, he is just worried about those little ole blue states. /s

[BigmanPigman]

9. He sounds like a 1930s gangster film.

"When we're ready we'll go in and we'll straighten out Chicago, just like we did D.C.," the president added"

Who talks like this? He thinks he is in the cast of Goodfellas.

[Evolve Dammit]

24. He IS a criminal mob boss. Convicted I might add...

[BigmanPigman]

25. I bet tne legit mob bosses don't sound this stupid.

[PortTack]

10. Let taco try...Gov Pritzker has already addressed this...ain't happenin'

[travelingthrulife]

11. why are judges allowing this when there is no emergency except in Demented Donnie's brain.

[BumRushDaShow]

12. In the case of D.C.

they are a captive to Congress (who is MIA), where the authority for the President is only supposed to be for 30 days before they have to get legislative permission from Congress to extend it.

For other cities, they have to wait until it actually happens to file a suit (unfortunately). But if it does happen in one city and others join to protest with that first city in a suit, they might all be able to be covered by an injunction.

[electric_blue68]

14. Hey, doofus, you ears would probably fall off if you really heard what most.. .

"beautiful Black ladies" say about you!

And bunch of us white ladies, too!
As well as other Women of color.

[Figarosmom]

16. He is so delusional.....nt

[Atreus]

18. Trump's 'Law and Order' Talk: Bluff or Constitutional Crisis?

Trump is once again threatening to “straighten out” cities like Chicago, New York, and San Francisco by sending in federal forces. Here’s how this realistically plays out, based on law, precedent, and politics.

What Trump can’t do
Outside of D.C., he has no direct authority over local police and can’t just take over a city.

State National Guard units answer to their governors. A Democratic governor (like Pritzker in Illinois or Hochul in New York) would have to approve activation for their state, unless Trump invoked something extraordinary.

The Posse Comitatus Act (1878) restricts use of the U.S. military in domestic law enforcement. Regular Army/Marines can’t just be deployed into Chicago or NYC to “police the streets.”

What he could try to do
Invoke the Insurrection Act (1807). This is the only real legal back door that allows a president to use federal troops in domestic law enforcement without governor approval — but it’s supposed to be reserved for rebellion, obstruction of federal law, or when civil authorities are completely unable/unwilling to maintain order. Even then, it would spark immediate lawsuits and likely end up in the Supreme Court.

Send federal agencies (FBI, ATF, DHS, DEA) into cities under the guise of “crime task forces.” He’s done this before — Operation Legend in 2020 was a smaller version of this, where federal officers were sent into Kansas City, Chicago, Albuquerque, etc. That’s far more likely than tanks rolling down Michigan Avenue.

Why this is political posturing
He’s clearly using crime in Democratic-run cities as a political weapon. It riles up his base, lets him attack Democratic mayors, and gives him a “law and order strongman” narrative going into 2026.

Legally, his hands are tied unless something extreme (riots, civil unrest, rebellion) happens that he can exploit. Governors will resist, courts will block, and Congress would weigh in.

The idea of the military “making Chicago safe” is pure theater — it appeals to a certain audience but collapses under legal and practical scrutiny.

How it could play out

The Bluff (Most Likely)
He ramps up federal task forces (FBI, ATF, DHS, DEA), calls a press conference, and claims victory. It’s noisy, politically useful, but limited in scope. No military, no city takeover.

The Insurrection Act Gambit (Worst-Case)
He tries to invoke the 1807 Insurrection Act to override governors and deploy troops. That triggers immediate lawsuits, national protests, and likely a showdown in the Supreme Court. The Pentagon itself might resist being used this way. It would be a full-blown constitutional crisis.

Bottom line
This is either political theater to rally his base, or an unprecedented abuse of power that collapses under legal and political resistance. The “uproar” is already there — but a lot of this is more about optics than actual authority.

[Mark.b2]

19. Rather, he should go to the red states....

Here in Arkansas—as red as they come—two cities trash the statewide crime stats. Little Rock and, my hometown, Pine Bluff. I’m certain the state’s Trump voters would be all for it.

The folks of Illinois and Cook County prefer the status quo and dont want help.

Go where the help is wanted and where it stands a chance of working.

[kiranon]

23. Fascism pure and simple

T wants a riot so he can declare martial law. Don't give it to him. It will be a miracle if the country isn't under Martial Law by January l, 2026. That is T's goal. Stay calm and fight. Intelligence, empathy, knowledge, couraae and how to solve most any thing is on our side.