Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(158,681 posts)
Sun Aug 17, 2025, 03:50 AM Aug 17

Trump admin threatening 'clean energy' and 'modernization' programs with new policy, states say

Source: msn/Law & Crime

12h


A coalition of states is suing the Trump administration for placing caps on federal reimbursements for a bevy of energy programs. On May 8, the Department of Energy (DOE) issued a "Policy Flash" that established "a maximum allowable dollar amount (stated in terms of a percentage of the total project award amount) that it will reimburse for allowable, allocable, and reasonable indirect costs."

The memorandum further went on to advise states and municipalities that the specific reimbursement "maximum percentage is 10 percent" and "inclusive of total indirect costs and fringe benefit costs." Buried under the bureaucratese, the plaintiffs states say, is an attack on "vital" state-run programs – one that is likely to raise costs for consumers in the states affected by the new policy. On Friday, in a 38-page lawsuit, 19 states and the District of Columbia, asked a federal judge in Oregon to vacate the policy, declare it "unlawful," and enjoin its application.

The plaintiffs, led by New York Attorney General Letitia James, say the litigation is necessary because the DOE awards provide the states "with key services and programs" and the new policy will "unlawfully limit" those awards to the detriment of renewable energy initiatives.

In real terms, basic administrative or staffing costs needed to run federally funded programs are known as "indirect" costs; employee benefits for program staff are known as "fringe" costs. "Because indirect and fringe costs awarded by the DOE to Plaintiff States fund crucial work like supporting energy security, lowering energy costs, reducing greenhouse gas pollution, and enabling the transition to clean energy sources, Plaintiffs bring this action to protect their states and institutions from DOE's unlawful policy," the lawsuit reads.

Read more: https://www.msn.com/en-us/politics/government/unlawful-unjustified-and-disruptive-trump-admin-threatening-clean-energy-and-modernization-programs-with-new-policy-states-say/ar-AA1KEr53



Full headline: 'Unlawful, unjustified, and disruptive': Trump admin threatening 'clean energy' and 'modernization' programs with new policy, states say

Link to SUIT (PDF viewer) - https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/26053001-ny-v-doe-complaint/

Link to SUIT (PDF) - https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/26053001/ny-v-doe-complaint.pdf
1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump admin threatening 'clean energy' and 'modernization' programs with new policy, states say (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Aug 17 OP
This isn't to save money -- they will attack "clean energy" wherever they find it William Seger Aug 17 #1

William Seger

(11,759 posts)
1. This isn't to save money -- they will attack "clean energy" wherever they find it
Sun Aug 17, 2025, 12:33 PM
Aug 17

... for the benefit of our "dirty energy" oligarchs, and the MAGA cult will support attacking anything that woke liberals support.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Trump admin threatening '...