9th Circuit sides with religious group that rescinded job offer over worker's same-sex spouse
Source: San Francisco Chronicle
An international religious ministry that offered a woman a job as a customer service representative was entitled to withdraw that offer after learning she was married to another woman, a federal appeals court ruled Tuesday, citing the Supreme Courts broad ministerial exception from civil rights laws.
Although the low-paying position Aubry McMahon sought with World Vision in Washington state involved only contact with donors and members of the public and would not have required her to take part in worship services, those contacts can be considered key religious functions central to World Visions mission, said the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco.
Unlike secretaries, accountants or janitors that perform in-house work, customer-service representatives are responsible for effectively communicating World Visions involvement in ministries and projects around the world, Judge Richard Tallman wrote in a 3-0 ruling that reversed a federal judges decision in McMahons favor.
[...]
The ruling was based on the Supreme Courts unanimous decision in the Hosanna-Tabor case in 2012 that allowed religious organizations to classify some of their non-clergy employees in that case, a teacher at a religious school as ministers who can be fired because of their race, sex, sexual orientation or other grounds normally forbidden by civil rights laws.
Read more: https://www.sfchronicle.com/politics/article/9th-circuit-ruling-world-vision-20803414.php

unblock
(55,569 posts)How they treat her differently from others.
I can't speak for the church, but I'm guessing they buy a basic tenet of Christianity, which is that all are sinners. Everyone.
So in rescinding the job offer for her, they'll offer it to someone else. Just trading one sin for another. Maybe a different one or one they can't immediately identify, but some sin regardless. Hell, probably many sins. No one's perfect.
In other words, calling her a sinner isn't nearly enough. They have to come up with a compelling rationale as to why someone with different or more concealed sins is more appropriate for the job.
IMHO, such christian organizations single out lgbtq "sins" as uniquely evil, justifying vastly more cruelty and condemnation than any other sin. These people will forgive murderers who "discovered Christ" in prison but their religion of forgiveness will never give them for loving the consenting adult of their choice.
stopdiggin
(14,278 posts)is whether they have a right to discriminate, within their hiring practices - regardless of the twists and turns (or illogic) of their religious belief.
(i.e., It doesn't make a particle of difference whether it makes and sense or not. It's what they believe - and they have a right to enforce that standard within their ranks.
IzzaNuDay
(1,068 posts)and I will gladly tell them why!!!