Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(152,902 posts)
Thu May 22, 2025, 10:26 AM Yesterday

Supreme Court deadlocks, blocking creation of first religious public school

Last edited Thu May 22, 2025, 11:34 AM - Edit history (1)

Source: Washington Post

Updated May 22, 2025 at 11:11 a.m. EDT


The Supreme Court deadlocked Thursday over the constitutionality of the nation’s first public religious charter school, blocking the creation of a controversial Catholic institution that would have reshaped American education and blurred the line between church and state. With only eight justices voting, the Supreme Court’s 4-4 tie in the blockbuster case leaves in place an Oklahoma State Supreme Court ruling that St. Isidore of Seville Catholic Virtual School would violate state law and the Constitution.

A ruling for St. Isidore would have allowed, for the first time, direct and complete taxpayer funding to establish a faith-based charter school, legalizing government sponsorship of a curriculum that calls for students to adhere to Catholic beliefs and the church’s religious mission.

Instead, the current landscape of government funding for religious schools remains intact. Under previous court rulings, taxpayer money may be used for vouchers that fund religious schools, but public schools — including charter schools — may not include religious teachings.

The tie is a disappointment for advocates of religious liberty who have spent years laying the groundwork for increased government funding of religious options. It came as a relief to opponents who say religious public charters blatantly violate the separation of church and state and could threaten the rights of religious minorities and gay people.

Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/05/22/supreme-court-oklahoma-religious-charter-schools/



Link to OPINION (PDF) - https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/24-394_9p6b.pdf


No paywall (gift)

Article updated.

Previous article -

Updated May 22, 2025 at 10:27 a.m. EDT


The Supreme Court deadlocked Thursday over the constitutionality of the nation's first public religious charter school, blocking the creation of the controversial Catholic online academy in Oklahoma.

With only eight justices voting, the Supreme Court's 4-4 tie leaves in place an Oklahoma State Supreme Court ruling that the school violates the separation of church and state.

A ruling for St. Isidore of Seville Catholic Virtual School would have allowed, for the first time, direct and complete taxpayer funding to establish a faith-based school, sanctioning government sponsorship of a curriculum that calls for students to adhere to Catholic beliefs and the church's religious mission.


This is a developing story. It will be updated.



Original article -

May 22, 2025 at 10:23 a.m. EDT


The Supreme Court on Thursday deadlocked over the constitutionality of the nation's first public religious charter school, blocking the creation of the controversial Catholic online academy in Oklahoma.

With only eight justices voting, the Supreme Court's 4-4 tie leaves in place an Oklahoma State Supreme Court ruling that the school violates the Constitution's separation of church and state.

A ruling for St. Isidore of Seville Catholic Virtual School would have allowed, for the first time, direct and complete taxpayer funding to establish a faith-based school, sanctioning government sponsorship of a curriculum that calls for students to adhere to Catholic beliefs and the church's religious mission.

This is a developing story. It will be updated.
17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Supreme Court deadlocks, blocking creation of first religious public school (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Yesterday OP
Who recused and didn't vote? Nt Fiendish Thingy Yesterday #1
Coney Barrett - didn't participate underpants Yesterday #2
Wow! MarineCombatEngineer Yesterday #5
She's been surprising me often. Shipwack Yesterday #6
Same here. calimary Yesterday #14
She is beginning to be the savior of our Constitution. May she continue un-bought and ununbowed. Jit423 Yesterday #9
Good one on her! peggysue2 Yesterday #11
Charter school funding is bankrupting a couple states. underpants Yesterday #12
Justice Amy Coney Barrett recused Tennessee Hillbilly Yesterday #3
I admire her for doing that. She didnt have to, and Im almost certain she didnt want to. SSJVegeta Yesterday #13
The four Justices that would have allowed it to happen didn't put the integrity of the Constitution First. cstanleytech Yesterday #16
Im pretty sure she is more of a religious zealot than all of them combined SSJVegeta Yesterday #17
Who was the 4th vote agsinst? Mz Pip Yesterday #4
They haven't updated yet BumRushDaShow Yesterday #7
Not sure, but it probably was CJ Roberts. nt MarineCombatEngineer Yesterday #8
Probably yes. They didn't release the vote count. underpants Yesterday #10
framing Be Leave On Yesterday #15

underpants

(190,742 posts)
2. Coney Barrett - didn't participate
Thu May 22, 2025, 10:29 AM
Yesterday

A key factor in the outcome was that conservative Justice Amy Coney Barrett, who would have been the deciding vote, did not participate in the case. She did not explain why, but it is likely because of her ties with Notre Dame Law School. The law school's religious liberty clinic represents the charter school.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/supreme-court-sidesteps-major-ruling-religious-public-charter-schools-rcna204111

MarineCombatEngineer

(15,508 posts)
5. Wow!
Thu May 22, 2025, 10:41 AM
Yesterday

Justice Barrett did the right thing?
It would seem that Been A Dick Donald's nominee isn't toeing the MAGAt line on certain issues near and dear to them.

Expect the usual call from the MAGAt's for her impeachment and removal from the SC.

Shipwack

(2,674 posts)
6. She's been surprising me often.
Thu May 22, 2025, 10:56 AM
Yesterday

Probably surprising Trump et al, too.

She’s definitely not the disaster I was thinking she would be. Though I still hold that she wasn’t qualified for the job (lack of experience, etc).

calimary

(86,347 posts)
14. Same here.
Thu May 22, 2025, 01:01 PM
Yesterday

Who thought she’d ever be reasonable?

Anybody who disappoints the donald can’t be all bad.

Jit423

(1,354 posts)
9. She is beginning to be the savior of our Constitution. May she continue un-bought and ununbowed.
Thu May 22, 2025, 11:06 AM
Yesterday

Courage is sometimes contagious.

peggysue2

(11,859 posts)
11. Good one on her!
Thu May 22, 2025, 11:19 AM
Yesterday

Barrett had the decency and ethical center to step back on this case. Thank God for that. A ruling for the Catholic School would be the beginning of the end for public education, something the MAGA/Heritage Foundation hates. There will no doubt be other cases but this ruling at least slows down the process.

Separation of Church and State is another pillar the arsonists are desperate to set afire.

The Founders bones are rattling!

SSJVegeta

(535 posts)
13. I admire her for doing that. She didnt have to, and Im almost certain she didnt want to.
Thu May 22, 2025, 12:53 PM
Yesterday

She put her integrity and the constitution above all else.

cstanleytech

(27,608 posts)
16. The four Justices that would have allowed it to happen didn't put the integrity of the Constitution First.
Thu May 22, 2025, 05:05 PM
Yesterday

Now that's scary.

SSJVegeta

(535 posts)
17. Im pretty sure she is more of a religious zealot than all of them combined
Thu May 22, 2025, 05:18 PM
Yesterday

And yet, she is the reason this didn't happen. At the very least she's proven herself to have more of a backbone and loyalty to our Republic than any of them can fathom.

BumRushDaShow

(152,902 posts)
7. They haven't updated yet
Thu May 22, 2025, 10:59 AM
Yesterday

I am about to add the opinion.

SCOTUSBlog has a live discussion feed - https://www.scotusblog.com/2025/05/announcement-of-opinions-for-thursday-may-22/

(some think Roberts did the 4th vote to kick the can)

underpants

(190,742 posts)
10. Probably yes. They didn't release the vote count.
Thu May 22, 2025, 11:07 AM
Yesterday

The court did not indicate how the justices voted – and oral arguments are not always an accurate predictor. But when the court heard the case in late April, Chief Justice John Roberts, in particular, asked sharp questions of both sides and appeared to be leaving his options on a decision open.

https://www.cnn.com/2025/05/22/politics/supreme-court-st-isidore-oklahoma

Be Leave On

(191 posts)
15. framing
Thu May 22, 2025, 01:22 PM
Yesterday

Saying the groups who wanted this pass wanted "religious liberty" is BS.
They wanted tax-payer funded of their own, particular religion.
Those in opposition were the actual fans of non-discriminatory religious liberty for all.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Supreme Court deadlocks, ...