Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hookaleft

(1,324 posts)
Thu Jun 25, 2026, 07:30 PM 14 hrs ago

Breaking: Katie Phang just won her lawsuit regarding Releasing the Epstein Files

Judge orders DOJ to produce, unredact sought after Epstein files

On Thursday, a federal judge based in Washington, D.C., ordered the Justice Department to unredact additional pages of the Epstein files in a suit brought by attorney and independent journalist Katie Phang.

The preliminary injunction orders redactions be removed in key documents of interest in the files, including “at least eight email exchanges with Mr. Epstein regarding a ‘torture video’ and sexual activity with young women, including minors” as well as interviews with a woman who said she was abused by President Trump as a minor.

“The Attorney General’s arguments are unpersuasive. First, Ms. Phang has identified ‘some concrete consequences of not receiving the information.’ She has identified ‘half a dozen stories she is currently unable to report’ because the Attorney General has not disclosed the information,” U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan wrote in a decision that also found Phang had a right to bring the case under the Administrative Procedures Act

https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/5941665-doj-epstein-files-lawsuit/


&t=29s
16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Breaking: Katie Phang just won her lawsuit regarding Releasing the Epstein Files (Original Post) hookaleft 14 hrs ago OP
Hot stuff. usonian 14 hrs ago #1
Great ruling. Though B.See 13 hrs ago #2
"torture video" Dave Bowman 13 hrs ago #3
Yes. Codifer 12 hrs ago #5
With These People? GB_RN 12 hrs ago #9
Unfortunately your logic is not flawed. FalloutShelter 1 hr ago #16
Way to go, Katie!!! Yay! BComplex 13 hrs ago #4
It was signed into law last year. warmfeet 12 hrs ago #6
"We tolerate everything it appears." OldBaldy1701E 1 hr ago #15
The courts are proving to be a check and balance - often...but not often enough. yellow dahlia 12 hrs ago #7
Fantastic! BeneteauBum 12 hrs ago #8
I suspect at least, one Shit-Bag may have a little hard time to fall asleep tonight.. chouchou 12 hrs ago #10
Thank you Katie Phang and Judge Emmett Sullivan FakeNoose 11 hrs ago #11
Let's go! Akakoji 10 hrs ago #12
just saw this on bsky -- here's the doc link/pdf orleans 10 hrs ago #13
Phang is great SocialDemocrat61 3 hrs ago #14

usonian

(27,160 posts)
1. Hot stuff.
Thu Jun 25, 2026, 07:45 PM
14 hrs ago

From The Hill.

On Thursday, a federal judge based in Washington, D.C., ordered the Justice Department to unredact additional pages of the Epstein files in a suit brought by attorney and independent journalist Katie Phang.

The preliminary injunction orders redactions be removed in key documents of interest in the files, including “at least eight email exchanges with Mr. Epstein regarding a ‘torture video’ and sexual activity with young women, including minors” as well as interviews with a woman who said she was abused by President Trump as a minor.

“The Attorney General’s arguments are unpersuasive. First, Ms. Phang has identified ‘some concrete consequences of not receiving the information.’ She has identified ‘half a dozen stories she is currently unable to report’ because the Attorney General has not disclosed the information,” U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan wrote in a decision that also found Phang had a right to bring the case under the Administrative Procedures Act.

He also rebuffed the idea that Phang could have simply requested the documents through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), noting that the department itself had previously said the Epstein Files Transparency Act “directed a much broader and less redacted release of the files than would have been made under the FOIA. Certain exemptions which may have been made under FOIA were not made” in the Epstein Act release.

B.See

(9,060 posts)
2. Great ruling. Though
Thu Jun 25, 2026, 08:03 PM
13 hrs ago

won't be holding my breath waiting for them to release them.

Remind me, how many court orders have Trump and his band of outlaws ignored by now?

Codifer

(1,214 posts)
5. Yes.
Thu Jun 25, 2026, 08:50 PM
12 hrs ago

That has always been my biggest and most horrific fear.

Ultimate power to ultimate "Thrill" to ultimate price.

I hope that my logic is flawed and the result is not inevitable.

GB_RN

(3,601 posts)
9. With These People?
Thu Jun 25, 2026, 09:06 PM
12 hrs ago

I don’t put ANYTHING past people with that kind of money. Why? Because they get bored, try something new, get bored, rinse and repeat. They keep chasing the dopamine fix, and that’s one hell of a jonesing. A jonesing they will never satisfy (for long) because, like hard drugs, it takes more and more for the same effect.

Never mind the big, black holes in the middle of them. You simply can’t fill it.

FalloutShelter

(14,743 posts)
16. Unfortunately your logic is not flawed.
Fri Jun 26, 2026, 08:39 AM
1 hr ago

I have made a minor study of this. At one time I considered writing a fiction. Over about it and gave that up because I did not want the truth of the existence of these monsters to live in my head.

Psychologists call it the Kink Spiral.
Normal sex, becomes twisted by porn addiction and soon the level of depravity begins to spiral toward more extreme , bondage, rape, torture, and snuff. A different level of stimuli is needed to get off.

Now imagine you have all the money in the world… what can’t you have? What debauched fantasy can you not procure?

I am 💯 certain this is where it all leads with Epstein and his clients.




warmfeet

(3,325 posts)
6. It was signed into law last year.
Thu Jun 25, 2026, 08:57 PM
12 hrs ago

Trump himself signed the bill into law. The complete files have not been released. This is so far beyond the pale, ugh - whatever. We tolerate everything it appears.

OldBaldy1701E

(11,799 posts)
15. "We tolerate everything it appears."
Fri Jun 26, 2026, 08:23 AM
1 hr ago

Yes, we certainly do.

FAR more than I thought we would.

FAR more.

chouchou

(3,429 posts)
10. I suspect at least, one Shit-Bag may have a little hard time to fall asleep tonight..
Thu Jun 25, 2026, 09:37 PM
12 hrs ago

(Wish it was forever)

orleans

(37,455 posts)
13. just saw this on bsky -- here's the doc link/pdf
Thu Jun 25, 2026, 11:45 PM
10 hrs ago

BREAKING: Judge Sullivan has GRANTED Katie Phang's preliminary injunction concluding she has standing, has been harmed, and will likely succeed on the merits of her case demanding the full release of the Epstein files. Blanche has until 7/2 to respond. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...

Mueller, She Wrote (@muellershewrote.com) 2026-06-25T21:59:30.653Z


BREAKING: Judge Sullivan has GRANTED Katie Phang's preliminary injunction concluding she has standing, has been harmed, and will likely succeed on the merits of her case demanding the full release of the Epstein files. Blanche has until 7/2 to respond. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...

link!!!
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.291779/gov.uscourts.dcd.291779.16.0_1.pdf


Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Breaking: Katie Phang jus...