Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

question everything

(52,438 posts)
Mon May 25, 2026, 12:01 PM 16 hrs ago

VLCC (Very Large Crude Carrie) Carrying Iraqi Oil Crosses Strait of Hormuz After Delays

A supertanker carrying nearly 2 million barrels of Iraqi crude oil completed a high-risk voyage through the Strait of Hormuz after facing delays, inspections, and mounting regional tensions tied to the Iran conflict. The vessel, Agios Fanourios II, was transporting oil from Iraq to Vietnam, with traders and shipping companies closely watching the journey as a signal of whether tanker traffic through the strait was starting to recover.

The cargo was reportedly arranged by Geneva-based trading firm Lytton SA, a low-profile company founded in 2024 by former Trafigura oil trader Hakim Darbouche and former Onex Dubai executive Alan Konyar. According to the report, the company bought Iraqi crude at discounts as deep as $18 per barrel below international benchmark prices at Basra port, creating a potential gross profit of about $60 million on a single shipment. Iraqi state oil sellers reportedly offered discounts of up to $33.4 per barrel during the month as regional instability disrupted commodity markets

The voyage became a closely watched test case for commercial shipping in the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world's most important oil transit routes. During the trip, the tanker was reportedly stopped by both Iranian and US authorities. The report said the US military suspected the vessel might be carrying Iranian crude oil. Vietnam's national oil company then contacted the US Naval Forces Central Command, arguing the cargo was critical for domestic fuel supply. After a five-day inspection process, the tanker was eventually cleared to continue.

The shipment also highlighted the growing risks and rewards facing oil traders during the current market disruption. Trading spreads in the oil market reportedly expanded to $20 to $30 per barrel, far above normal margins of only a few cents. Industry sources said a single VLCC cargo could now generate profits between $40 million and $60 million. However, shipping costs for the Agios Fanourios II voyage alone were estimated at $35 million to $40 million because of insurance, security, and operational risks tied to the route.

The report said tanker operators navigating the Strait of Hormuz now face both maritime security threats and sanctions exposure. Iran has reportedly sought transit-related payments from passing vessels, while the US Treasury has warned that paying such fees could violate US sanctions rules and expose foreign firms to penalties. Lytton SA and the vessel's management company, Eastern Mediterranean Maritime, said no transit fees were paid to Iran during this voyage.

https://www.newsglobenow.com/new365395.html

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
VLCC (Very Large Crude Carrie) Carrying Iraqi Oil Crosses Strait of Hormuz After Delays (Original Post) question everything 16 hrs ago OP
Basically Iran and the U.S. separately agreed that Iraq and Vietnam had nothing to do with the current conflict dalton99a 16 hrs ago #1
The status quo satisfies both sides at this point bucolic_frolic 15 hrs ago #2

dalton99a

(95,482 posts)
1. Basically Iran and the U.S. separately agreed that Iraq and Vietnam had nothing to do with the current conflict
Mon May 25, 2026, 12:06 PM
16 hrs ago

bucolic_frolic

(55,919 posts)
2. The status quo satisfies both sides at this point
Mon May 25, 2026, 12:22 PM
15 hrs ago

A trickle of oil, just enough to keep the world functioning. If they completely shut down the flow, we would have to do something, like bomb and/or invade. In reverse order, if we bomb and/or invade first, it would shut down the flow of oil.

This may continue for quite awhile. Neither side has a clear path to improving the situation, and unilateral actions will likely make it worse.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»VLCC (Very Large Crude Ca...