Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDeus ex machina: Half of US Christians trust AI's spiritual advice
https://www.theregister.com/ai-ml/2026/05/21/deus-ex-machina-half-of-us-christians-trust-ais-spiritual-advice/5244371AI sycophancy + spirituality = uh oh
Who needs a minister when you have an LLM? America's Christian population appears to have found God in precisely the place you'd expect a manifestation of the divine to be spotted in 2026: Amid AI chatbot responses.
A survey of Americans published this week by Evangelical polling outfit Barna sought to discover what Christians thought about AI's ability to serve as a spiritual mentor, and the split is surprisingly even: A full 48 percent of practicing US Christians told the organization that they trusted AI's advice to aid their spiritual growth.
Potentially more surprising than that, 34 percent said spiritual advice dispensed by an AI was just as trustworthy as what they'd get out of a flesh-and-blood pastor. That share rises, unsurprisingly, among younger Christians, with 39 percent of Gen Z respondents and 44 percent of Millennials agreeing that preachers and AI are at trust parity.
. . .
"Christians say they trust AI with spiritual growth, and a meaningful share say its spiritual guidance is as trustworthy as a pastor's--yet large majorities are simultaneously concerned about AI misinterpreting scripture, replacing God, or undermining the role of spiritual leaders, Barna VP of research Daniel Copeland said of the findings, which he called "confounding."
. . .
A survey of Americans published this week by Evangelical polling outfit Barna sought to discover what Christians thought about AI's ability to serve as a spiritual mentor, and the split is surprisingly even: A full 48 percent of practicing US Christians told the organization that they trusted AI's advice to aid their spiritual growth.
Potentially more surprising than that, 34 percent said spiritual advice dispensed by an AI was just as trustworthy as what they'd get out of a flesh-and-blood pastor. That share rises, unsurprisingly, among younger Christians, with 39 percent of Gen Z respondents and 44 percent of Millennials agreeing that preachers and AI are at trust parity.
. . .
"Christians say they trust AI with spiritual growth, and a meaningful share say its spiritual guidance is as trustworthy as a pastor's--yet large majorities are simultaneously concerned about AI misinterpreting scripture, replacing God, or undermining the role of spiritual leaders, Barna VP of research Daniel Copeland said of the findings, which he called "confounding."
. . .
10 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Deus ex machina: Half of US Christians trust AI's spiritual advice (Original Post)
erronis
Thursday
OP
These psychos are going to be talking to their God necklaces, like they always have BUT
Maru Kitteh
Thursday
#7
malaise
(298,141 posts)1. Well they trusted and continue to trust the scoundrel
televangelists and mega church thieves didnt /dont they?
erronis
(24,582 posts)2. Comments from the article seem to mirror our sentiments...
Christians
are by definition gullible, lacking a reasoning ability, so this comes as no surprise. More woo on top of woo.
are by definition gullible, lacking a reasoning ability, so this comes as no surprise. More woo on top of woo.
Re: Christians
You'd think that believing spiritual advice dispensed by an AI was just as trustworthy would show some degree of self-awareness, but I suspect the opposite is true.
You'd think that believing spiritual advice dispensed by an AI was just as trustworthy would show some degree of self-awareness, but I suspect the opposite is true.
ZDU
(1,425 posts)3. Bless their hearts...
... in the utmost Southern sense
lame54
(40,154 posts)4. In Futurama there is...
A robot God
A robot Jesus
And a robot devil
stopdiggin
(15,653 posts)5. I'm not at all sure why this is supposed to surprise
there is something unique about spiritual guidance .... ?
(as opposed to financial, or health, scientific, or historical ..?)
That would cause me to particularly eschew advice on that topic?
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
DBoon
(25,159 posts)6. Do they say how many non-believers trust AI for spiritual advice?
I bet the percent is very very low
Maru Kitteh
(32,018 posts)7. These psychos are going to be talking to their God necklaces, like they always have BUT
now a handful of glitchy, amoral, hallucinating chat bots will be SPEAKING BACK to them in soothing, flattering tones.
yikes. they really nailed the target demo.there.
wiggs
(8,861 posts)8. Sounds like the basis of a sci fi novel from Asimov! In fact, there is something similar: read Asimov's 'Entropy' nt
msongs
(74,243 posts)9. vs invisble old man in sky?
lindysalsagal
(22,999 posts)10. Gullible is gullible.
No surprise, there.