General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHoly crap, I totally agree with George Will!
For starters, he called this government a "loutocracy." I'm using that!
"Assume this loutocracys statements on its deportation mania are lies until proven otherwise."
For a glimpse of what government of, by and for louts looks like, find on the internet the video, taken by a citizen in Minneapolis, in which a participant in the excitement of a melee tear gas and other instruments for combating citizens exclaims: Its like Call of Duty! So cool huh? Call of Duty is a video game, away from which some new agents were perhaps lured by the signing bonuses, some up to $50,000, that have fueled the agencys breakneck expansion.
Today, it is more than prudent, it is good citizenship to assume that everything ICE says, and everything the administration says in support of its deportation mania, is untrue until proved to be otherwise. Or, as Noem might say, until it has been adjusted.
Some administration louts have said that the most recent (as of this writing) person killed in Minneapolis by a federal officer was a would-be assassin and, of course, a domestic terrorist. Because Republicans control congressional committee gavels, and because todays president controls congressional Republicans, there will be no oversight of ICEs rampages. The Senate, which disgraced itself by confirming Noem and others unqualified for Cabinet positions, is especially unlikely to suddenly acquire the inconvenience of a conscience. So, expect more killings, and more political smearing of the victims. That ICEs disgraces will continue is, in its revolting way, a promise kept: loutocracy.
https://archive.is/7DpSa
ms liberty
(11,037 posts)Good thing it's a rarity.
UpInArms
(54,301 posts)Twice a day
TomSlick
(12,926 posts)chicoescuela
(2,744 posts)Jack Valentino
(4,556 posts)who never sold his soul to Trump for the sake of Republican electoral victories...
the kind which has become very rare in the Republican side of Congress...
UpInArms
(54,301 posts)I just always called him George Will You Just Go Away
Jack Valentino
(4,556 posts)but he wrote on the right side of history in this instance!
(probably will get a bunch of maggot threats for doing so!)
regnaD kciN
(27,521 posts)George Will is one of the greatest minds of the 18th century.
Jack Valentino
(4,556 posts)I don't believe that is the right moment to bring up all of his 'past sins'....
We can argue about the budget later....
dalton99a
(92,632 posts)struggle4progress
(125,567 posts)Notice he's doing nothing to push back against it: he's just crowing that we can't stop it
thebigidea
(13,562 posts)He's been writing against Trump for a decade now.
struggle4progress
(125,567 posts)of the Trump era -- and Wills strongly supported all three
The theory that the President is an absolute monarch was argued by Nixon before the Court, and folk like Wills did everything they could to make that a reality. The "unitary executive" supporters were pushed onto SCOTUS by Bush
Attacks on the press and on many asylum seekers were hallmarks of the Reagan era -- and so was support for South African racists
We didn't get where we are today just because of Trump. Wills has played a long ugly game. Don't look to him for our strategies
stopdiggin
(15,124 posts)especially in characterizing this piece as 'crowing' over the degradation and excess ...
That one - was a big FAT miss.
Just about the farthest thing FROM ... And it fairly plain English ...
(you're not required to be an admirer of George Will .... But .... )
struggle4progress
(125,567 posts)He has followed a fairly predictable conservative playbook
stopdiggin
(15,124 posts)What I said was that you had severely mischaracterized this piece.
And particularly with the 'crowing' bit. There simply isn't any of that evident.
GusBob
(8,180 posts)He is pointing out that Ordinary folks and their smart phones are bringing the truth out
Which is totally in the push back of the endless lying of the current rule
progressoid
(52,708 posts)I mis-read that as LOOTocracy!
Both work.
niyad
(130,219 posts)niyad
(130,219 posts)Martin68
(27,228 posts)fact that he is one of the people responsible for what has happened to this country. He's always been an elitist, and that is one reason he hates Trump.
Ocelot II
(129,593 posts)He's a pompous dick, but that doesn't mean he's wrong.
Martin68
(27,228 posts)columns. But it is a rare column, even when he is criticizing a Republican, that he doesn't sneak in a mean attack on liberalism. He is a phony intellectual, a partisan dialogue, and a nasty person. He has supported without exception or question, every Republican president that led us to our present situation. He hated Roosevelt, JFK, Carter, Gore, Obama, Biden, and Harris.
Ocelot II
(129,593 posts)kwolf68
(8,291 posts)Will's commentary is something I'd like to hear from some of our Dem leadership. Yea he sucks for the most part, but he has this one right. The vitriol against him clouds the words he may be saying to people NOT on the left who can help us fight fascism. No purity tests now, all hands on deck and if George Will says or does anything remotely resembling someone trying to save our nation, I applaud him. We can fight with him about progressive taxation and other issues after we rid ourselves of these fascist maniacs in control.
Ocelot II
(129,593 posts)current or former, inevitably there will be a barrage of comments about how much that person sucks, irrespective of the validity or truth of the material at issue. Yes, George Will is a bloviating conservative who has always advocated for positions with which I disagree intensely. And also, George Will wrote an opinion today with which I totally agree. It is entirely possible for these two realities to exist at the same time, and the first is completely irrelevant to the second.
Jack Valentino
(4,556 posts)(but too few do nowadays), such as opposition to government tyranny which we now have---
(but from the right instead of the left, which frankly, was the brand of tyranny I always feared
would eventually occur, from the RIGHT wing---),
well, that is worthy of recognition, particularly because they are too few now---
but their ranks are growing!
It doesn't mean we will ever agree with their ideas about the federal budget or whatever---
but at this point in time, support for free speech and democracy and opposition to dictators
seem a little more important to me,
and I welcome the vocal support of any Republicans and conservatives
who always claimed to support these values----
even though their ranks have been sadly diminished by those
who surrendered their political morals in favor of supporting one deeply flawed 'man',
if you can call him that....
Thanks for your post on this.
reACTIONary
(7,009 posts)... I sometimes accidentally read one of his columns when the headline draws me in and I don't look closely at the authorship.
gulliver
(13,783 posts)Maru Kitteh
(31,362 posts)Save us.
progree
(12,783 posts)bmichaelh
(1,101 posts)From Wikipedia:
The word was coined as early as the 17th century[4] and derives from two Greek words, kákistos (κάκιστος, 'worst') and krátos (κράτος, 'rule'), together meaning 'government by the worst people
UTUSN
(77,206 posts)kysrsoze
(6,417 posts)shoot people in the back. They hired the lowest of lowlifes.
Sam I Yam
(58 posts)Sadly, we don't have Hackman and DaFoe on the case, but Donald Fuckup and Kristi NoMind.