General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAre the Groypers so far right that sometimes they sound like far leftists?
Forgive me here because I don't know much about the Groypers, but there can be a point at which you are so far right that you start to resemble the far left. Vice versa too, that you can be so far left that you start to sound like the far right. Anti-Semitism is a good example of this phenomenon.

John1956PA
(4,470 posts)DFW
(58,943 posts)Ideas are more powerful than guns. We would not let our enemies have guns, why should we let them have ideas? Stalin
"The people who cast the votes decide nothing. The people who count the votes decide everything"--Stalin
Education is a weapon, the effect of which is determined by the hands which wield it, by who is to be struck down.Stalin
"Education is a weapon whose effects depend on who holds it in his hands and at whom it is aimed"Stalin
"The idea of a concentration camp is excellent"Stalin
"Gratitude is a sickness suffered by dogs"Stalin
The history of all countries shows that the working class exclusively by its own effort is able to develop only trade-union consciousness.Lenin
A lie told often enough becomes the truth.Lenin
One man with a gun can control 100 without one.Lenin
It is true that liberty is precious; so precious that it must be carefully rationed.Lenin
When buying and selling are controlled by legislation, the first things to be bought and sold are legislators.P.J. ORourke
It is rotten and dismal that a world of so many hundred million people should be ruled by a single caste that has the power to lead millions to life or to death, indeed on a whim...This caste has spun its web over the entire earth; capitalism recognizes no national boundaries...Capitalism has learned nothing from recent events and wants to learn nothing, because it places its own interests ahead of those of the other millions.Göbbels
Hypocrisy is the characteristic feature of the dying bourgeois epochGöbbels
To be a socialist means to let the ego serve the neighbour, to sacrifice the self for the whole. In its deepest sense socialism equals service. The individual refrains and the commonwealth demands.Göbbels
Life is worth living. It's not true, what the tired and reactionary say. We're not on this earth to suffer and die. We're here to fulfill a mission.Göbbels
It is the State which educates its citizens in civic virtue, gives them a consciousness of their mission and welds them into unity.
― Benito Mussolini
Skittles
(167,498 posts)people who want healthcare for all and everyone treated like human beings?
leftstreet
(37,273 posts)then we could compare
marybourg
(13,534 posts)leftstreet
(37,273 posts)uh, Animal Liberation Front?
I had no idea
vanlassie
(6,127 posts)
Ocelot II
(127,253 posts)the ones who are off-the-charts communists, e.g., the old USSR or the current North Korea, not any American leftists that I know of, unless there are still a few remnants of the old SDS and the like left over from the '60s (I knew some of those guys in those days, and they really were pretty extreme).
LeftInTX
(34,006 posts)Ocelot II
(127,253 posts)The left-wing extremism of the Bolsheviks after the Russian Revolution eventually led to the totalitarian USSR under Stalin. North Korea is still doing it, maybe even more than the USSR. The right-wing extremism of the Nazis and Italian fascists during WWII became totalitarian as well. When an ideology becomes extreme in either direction it's hard to get enough people to go along with it for it to become a state's governing principle unless it's enforced by outlawing and punishing dissent.
Gaugamela
(3,003 posts)who advocates either. The radical left wants to welcome everyone into the social contract; the radical right wants to remake society in their own image and kill anyone who doesnt like it.
The horseshoe cliche is bs.
Ocelot II
(127,253 posts)at least any more. During the '60s and '70s there were some fringe groups like the SLA that did commit acts of violence.
Gaugamela
(3,003 posts)some 50 years ago. There are no active militant leftist movements today. Theres always going to be a few people with unusual or eccentric leftist views (communism, anarchism), but they are not currently a movement, and in a democracy the only truly radical act is to overthrow the prevailing order through violence or coercion, which is what were seeing on the right.
Anyway, the whole point of the OP looks to me like hes trying to sneak a pro-Israel position in through the back door.
AllyCat
(18,223 posts)I made the comment that the political spectrum seemed more circular to me than linear.
He did not agree.
But I find your comment familiar to me.
Bernardo de La Paz
(58,520 posts)Fiscal policy and social policy (rights, crime) form four quadrants on a plane.
Fiscal conservatives, socially conservative: RepubliCons, faux libertarians
Fiscal liberals, socially conservative: classic southern Democrats, National Socialist party of prewar Germany, most communisms
Fiscal liberals, socially liberal: most Democrats, some communisms
Fiscal conservatives, socially liberal: true libertarians
The extreme edges and corners of any quadrant is basically authoritarian and totalitarian.
AllyCat
(18,223 posts)But we always hear left and right.
Mosby
(19,044 posts)They can share some characteristics like coercion for example but are still quite different.
Compare these statements:
Justice Brandeis
(294 posts)So there is some overlap there, and many differences too.
muriel_volestrangler
(104,746 posts)No, the far left want government-run child protective services. They want government-run everything.
Justice Brandeis
(294 posts)Same with anti-vaxxerism.
Torchlight
(5,695 posts)Good luck
WarGamer
(17,903 posts)Political alignment is like a belt around you waist.
The buckle is front and center... the pockets are right and left, the hips are the extremes and both extremes meet at the back... like Stalin and Hitler in WW2.
markodochartaigh
(4,045 posts)consist of economic and of political components. The economic and political components do not necessarily relate to each other, i.e. you can be extreme right or extreme left and think that all citizens should get health care.
In the US there is effectively no extreme economic left. When the extreme right says extreme economic left they are referring to people and ideologies that would have been considered moderate fifty years ago.
It is also necessary to state that there are economic components to ideologies as well as
social components. In the US social and economic components are usually bundled together. This muddies the waters, but it is useful to our oiligarchs who want to lead us around with social issues which, while important to us in the hoi-polloi, most of our oiligarchs don't really care about. They keep us distracted and divided by a few dozen trans athletes so that we don't agitate for health care and job rights for all.
Over the last century social components in the US have generally moved left while economic components have moved right since about 1980.
In societies such as Russia and China the left wing economic movements were generally socially authoritarian politically since their societies had long histories of authoritarianism. The US had a large measure of anti-authoritarianism after the English king was overthrown. The anti-authoritarianism became stronger and stronger here after the plantation system was overthrown and as various groups, non-landowners, women, Asians, Native Americans were enabled to vote and to participate politically.
In other words, the authoritarianism has nothing to do with whether right or left wing views on economic issues or social issues are espoused. There is both right-wing and left-wing authoritarianism and either of those can espouse any social or economic view on the spectrum. Social views being the rights of minorities or of individuals.
In maga we have both extreme right wing economic and social ideologies, with authoritarianism.
KentuckyWoman
(7,285 posts)It's just skeery words they can fling around to justify behaving like thugs. None of anything being said is based in fact. Not even "alternative facts". They just decide on a narrative and the media pushes it for them.
Locutusofborg
(572 posts)Groypers are not so far right that they can sound like leftists. Groypers intentionally use progressive terminology to confuse and obfuscate their messages.
Groypers want non-Gropyers to be confused about what is really being said. Its like their own internal code. You have to be a Groyper to be able to interpret the true meaning.
Much of Groyper code language is based on violent video game memes and expressions.
RedWhiteBlueIsRacist
(1,126 posts)BigmanPigman
(53,797 posts)JI7
(92,651 posts)is common among them.
Blasphemer
(3,458 posts)The fringe left and extreme right started converging around libertarianism (anti-vax, distrust of government, etc.). However, now that the extreme right is embracing authoritarianism, I suspect things will reverse course.
Lovie777
(20,283 posts)underpants
(193,044 posts)All in one.
They think its clever or something
Response to Justice Brandeis (Original post)
ZDU This message was self-deleted by its author.
regnaD kciN
(27,275 posts)Basically, the Groypers share a characteristic with lots of young people today: the sense that they are permanently behind the 8-ball, that their lives are going to be crap, and that no one can change that. That leads to a dark nihilism, where the only response is to commiserate via irony and cultural in-references. That leads to messages where, to the outside world, something that seems far left might be far right, or vice versa, but oftentimes is just impenetrable.
While I am not an X fan. I found this incredibly helpful:
Link to tweet
?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1967009991719874959%7Ctwgr%5E1ac27a8afd7f27f249652c6ec80e17978ef11ca4%7Ctwcon%5Es1_c10&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fdemocraticunderground.com%2F100220640642
no_hypocrisy
(53,083 posts)GreenWave
(11,636 posts)Wake me up when the far right starts clamoring non-stop for workers' rights.
marble falls
(68,605 posts)B.See
(6,657 posts)bothsiderism claptrap to me.