General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNo, this is NOT a "watershed moment!"
Posted this just now on social media:
Much has been said about Kirk being a great advocate of the First Amendment, and how he sought to engage in "civil" dialogue with those with whom he disagreed with. Sorry, no, that just doesn't wash. Kirk was, of course, unfailingly polite and courteous in his back-and-forth with his opponents. But the ideology he was promoting -- how ever civilly and politely he presented it -- was hateful to its core! When a person argues that extending the same civil rights he gets to take for granted to a group that had historically been denied them was a "mistake," that is the very essence of hate. Or when he argues that "God's perfect law" states that gay people, who have long been disproportionately the targets of violence, should be stoned to death (and then tries to pretend he wasn't calling for violence against gay people because he didn't explicitly call for capital punishment of gay people _today_), again, that is inherently hateful.
Kirk, like many bigots before him, was savvy enough to understand that he needed to mask his hateful ideology behind a veneer of politesse in order to be taken seriously by the mainstream. But a polite bigot is still a bigot, and a hateful ideology is no less a hateful ideology when presented politely.or "civilly."
And you want to know what else is hateful? The assignations of collective blame against an entire group of citizens for the actions of one individual, who, I might add, wasn't even a member of the group being blamed. Elected Republicans continue to spew this, blaming the "radical left" for the actions of a shooter who wasn't even part of the left, despite the fact that virtually every Democratic leader came out immediately with a full-throated denunciation of Kirk's murder. Nobody on the left has anything to apologize for with regard to the murder of Charlie Kirk. Kirk promoted an ideology of hate, and was ultimately consumed by the very hatred he himself had helped to foster!

ITAL
(1,203 posts)If you meant that none of the thousands of people who died of gun deaths caused flags to be flown at half staff was inclusive of the mass shootings you mentioned, but Sandy Hook, Pulse Night Club, and the Las Vegas shootings were marked by flags being flown at half staff.
I agree with you that Kirk's shooting doesn't warrant the honor, but I wasn't sure if you were saying that none of those other incidents got that mark of respect...but they all did.
If I'm not mistaken, even Ron DeSantis has ordered flags in FL lowered every year to mark the date of the Pulse shooting.
markodochartaigh
(4,018 posts)Archduke Ferdinand wasn't exactly the most powerful ruler in Europe. Just because something shouldn't be a watershed moment doesn't mean that it won't be. Conflicts often arise not because rational thinkers would conclude that the issue of the moment warrants conflict, but because passions have been stirred up.
leftstreet
(37,255 posts)Shocking, blood-spurting, instant death...the stuff of video games and movies
If no one had filmed it - we just heard he'd been shot somewhere- I think it would be different
Keepthesoulalive
(1,819 posts)But this admin is about a tv reality show and they want eye balls and brain suspension. Most Americans dont care about anything other than the next reality show hit.
myohmy2
(3,676 posts)...is the " watershed moment" are so many considering his death a " watershed moment"...
...to me his death is secondary to the reaction and is a barometer of the condition of our country...
...and it ain't good...
Deminpenn
(17,002 posts)have seen how hateful rhetoric can come back to bite them and it scares them.
Response to Deminpenn (Reply #7)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Deminpenn
(17,002 posts)Last edited Sun Sep 14, 2025, 04:12 PM - Edit history (1)
Conservatives seem to be a fearful lot overall.
Response to Deminpenn (Reply #9)
Name removed Message auto-removed