General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThis message was self-deleted by its author
This message was self-deleted by its author (PeaceWave) on Fri Sep 12, 2025, 08:17 PM. When the original post in a discussion thread is self-deleted, the entire discussion thread is automatically locked so new replies cannot be posted.

SamuelTheThird
(285 posts)What more clear example of political violence is there than that?
And , yes, Kirk was a scumbag. The encomiums are a joke.
Response to SamuelTheThird (Reply #1)
PeaceWave This message was self-deleted by its author.
dweller
(27,170 posts)The Pisswig pardon ?
lot of good it does him now
✌🏻
MichMan
(15,980 posts)You are so very droll.
You do know, I trust, that the only place where inferences from taking the fifth are prohibited is in a petit jury during deliberations.
Bluetus
(1,578 posts)Juries use their own judgment, and if they feel that inferences are applicable, that is exactly what they will do and nobody can stop them.
Lawyers are not allowed to argue that point directly, but they can certainly find ways to lead jurors to that place.
mahatmakanejeeves
(66,805 posts)Full disclosure: IANAL. From 2018:
Why you shouldn't assume Trump is guilty if he takes the Fifth
By Josh Barro
May 12, 2018, 10:03 AM ET
A lot of people assume that if you exercise your Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination it means you're guilty.
President Donald Trump himself has made this accusation in the past.
But now Trump's own lawyer says he may take the Fifth if he has to testify in the Russia investigation.
Criminal defense attorney Ken White says this assumption is wrong and damaging; the Fifth Amendment serves to protect both the innocent and the guilty.
{snip}
A lot of [Trumps] detractors today feel roughly the way he felt two years ago: The Fifth is for the guilty, if you're invoking it that means you have something to hide, and an innocent person shouldn't fear discussing his activities with federal investigators or in front of a grand jury.
Trump was wrong then, and his detractors are wrong now.
There are a wide variety of reasons to surmise that Trump and his associates have committed crimes. But his exercise of constitutional rights shouldn't be one of them.
{snip}
The Fifth Amendment is not just for the guilty it's also for those who would like to stay innocent
{snip}
[Ken White, a criminal-defense lawyer practicing in Los Angeles, and formerly a federal prosecutor,] urged that we not lose sight of the original purpose of the constitutional right against self-incrimination: It serves to protect the innocent from situations in which they can be pressured into confessing or committing perjury. The amendment is a recognition of the way governments can abuse their enormous power over criminal defendants, a problem that could be seen all the way back to the Salem witch trials and before.
{snip}