General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhy, Donny RIngo...you look like Epstein just...walked over your Rose Garden umbrella patio
Frantic Trump Tries to Kill Vote to Force Open Epstein FilesRAMPING UP THE PRESSURE
A rogue Republican is rounding up GOP signatures.
Cameron Adams
Cameron Adams Reporter
Updated Sep. 3 2025 4:34AM EDT
Published Sep. 3 2025 4:22AM EDT
https://www.thedailybeast.com/frantic-trump-tries-to-kill-vote-to-force-open-epstein-files/
The White House has warned Republican rebels in Congress that pushing for the full release of the Jeffrey Epstein pedophile abuse files would be seen as a very hostile act by President Donald Trump.
The GOP-controlled House Oversight and Government Reform Committee released more than 33,000 Epstein documents on Tuesday evening, after a closed-door meeting with multiple victims of Epstein and accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell.
Democrats complained, however, 97 percent of the documents were already in the public record, and Republican Thomas Massie, who has clashed regularly with Trump this year, stepped up his push for a House vote on the release of the documents in full.
A White House official told CNN, Helping Thomas Massie and Liberal Democrats with their attention-seeking, while the DOJ is fully supporting a more comprehensive file release effort from the Oversight Committee, would be viewed as a very hostile act to the administration.

hatrack
(63,447 posts)
Irish_Dem
(73,828 posts)johnnyfins
(2,770 posts)wonderful press would have the guts to actually ask that question.
OldBaldy1701E
(8,903 posts)Repeatedly.
spanone
(140,012 posts)An innocent man would demand they release EVERYTHING
Irish_Dem
(73,828 posts)spanone
(140,012 posts)Irish_Dem
(73,828 posts)Miles Archer
(20,125 posts)Here's the issue that I have NOT heard articulated by ANY "reporter / journalist."
Trump HANGING OUT WITH EPSTEIN, OFTEN, is not "fake news." HE DID.
That means he saw, first-hand, how "young" these women were. It's not like Trump spent an hour with him, left, and then Epstein yelled "OK, he's gone, bring out the underaged girls!"
Trump has no filters. He just says what's on his mind and doesn't give a damn about how anyone takes it. That's how we got the Access Hollywood tape.
So he was THERE. And, whoever wants to believe Ghislane "Golly Gee, I Sure Would Love A Pardon" Maxwell, he saw what was going on. He got a pretty good understanding of "what Jeff liked."
Now he wants to either pretend that he wasn't there, or that he was an innocent bystander.
ALAN DERSHOWITZ got a "massage" from one of Epstein's underaged girls and said it was OK "because he kept his underpants on."
That's what we're dealing with here, folks.
Attilatheblond
(7,103 posts)What's that smell? Fear!
Isn't there ample evidence that a lot of trafficking of women and girls used 'modeling agencies' to round up and move 'talent'? And there are plenty of beautiful grown women to have pageants with so why did he insist on having one for teen age girls that he could walk in on while they were in states of undress?
Why?
BECAUSE HE'S A CHILD MOLESTER, likely rapist.
Miles Archer
(20,125 posts)Trump and Epstein both used the same "Modeling Agency." She's tried to deny that's how they met but did you notice she SUED the Daily Mail (U.K.) for discussing her "past," but hasn't threatened to SUE anyone over the "Modeling Agency" comments? She's DENIED it, but she's even more petulant and litigious than her husband, so if it were a falsehood, SHE WOULD HAVE ALREADY SUED.
MadameButterfly
(3,493 posts)than Massey's bill, just to confuse the issue for the uninformed
BoRaGard
(7,295 posts)repubes like to think of themselves as morally superior -- while circling the wagons to protect their pedo BESTIES.
RVN VET71
(2,971 posts)I'm not saying that all Fascist Republicans (which is a redundancy, I know, I know) are pedos, themselves. I'm just saying that so many of them are, it's understandable why they'd want to protect one of their own. The rest, of course, the non-pedos, are just sniveling moral cowards, like Mike Johnson.
live love laugh
(15,783 posts)RVN VET71
(2,971 posts)makes me wonder if he thinks that's the way to secure his "God's" forgiveness for his transgressions against children. Makes sense, in a sordid kind of way.
Attilatheblond
(7,103 posts)RVN VET71
(2,971 posts)A true American hero ignored by the Government when he exposed the operators of a would-be fascist coup. Even FDR, for chrissakes suffered from Democratic wimpiness at times. Even FDR.
Attilatheblond
(7,103 posts)A true patriot who enlisted when under age and rose thru the ranks. He was beloved by most soldiers under his eventual command. That's why the rich bastards wanted him to be their puppet leading pissed off WWI veterans who got screwed out of their promised benefits.
Butler needs to be taught in US History, not ignored by it. His life is a study in dealing with manipulation, corruption of government by corporations and greedy bastards. All of the roots of today's problems.
EYESORE 9001
(28,939 posts)Historically, prosecutors are inherently hostile towards defendants of any sort. What makes the people on Epsteins lists sofa king special?
💰💸💵💶💷💴🤑
augyboston
(372 posts)RELEASE THE BEAUTIFUL EPSTEIN FILES NOW!!!
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER!
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(128,132 posts)Unpeeling like an onion.
marble falls
(67,943 posts)twodogsbarking
(15,467 posts)
ProudMNDemocrat
(20,162 posts)IbogaProject
(4,897 posts)This warrants "We can assume Trump is guilty based on his actions", if asking for disclosure during fact finding is a hostile act then the only reasonable course is to assume his guilt.
MadameButterfly
(3,493 posts)We need the proof
Hey Joe
(207 posts)After all, they may lose their precious access to the thug if they actually ask pertinent or fact based questions. Amiright CNN, NBC,CBS, ABC,
Fox,Newsmax, etc
MadameButterfly
(3,493 posts)So far Republicans have caved to every threat.
Is it different with the Epstein files?
Will Massie himself hold up?
The threat is likely sufficient to keep the additional 2 he needs from siding with Massie.
Usually they allow a few dissdents as long as it's not enough to pass a vote. Anyone who has real power to pass a bill (like the additional 2 Rs they need) will be threatened with more than a primary.
I got my hopes up that Rs in the House would go for this en mass. But when it's down to a 2-3 critical votes, the risk is too high. I hope I'm wrong. This is our chance if there ever is one.
MLWR
(513 posts)Helping Thomas Massie and Liberal Democrats with their attention-seeking, while the DOJ is fully supporting a more comprehensive file release effort from the Oversight Committee, would be viewed as a very hostile act to the administration.
Trueblue Texan
(3,699 posts)Nothing to see, but who else was thinking there was someone hidden in the trash can?
paleotn
(20,824 posts)Actually and figuratively? Theyre never about justice for anyone, ever. So thats not behind this push for release. In addition to their fetish about Dems and Epstein, perhaps they feel this may rid them forever of Donnies dying carcass. Just a passing thought.
Attilatheblond
(7,103 posts)Martin Eden
(14,829 posts)Yeah, right. Trump wants EVERYTHING released, and simply doesn't want a side effort distracting from his FULL TRANSPARENCY.
Plus, for a limited time only, the Trump administration has a special offer to sell a bridge in Brooklyn.
H2O Man
(77,805 posts)is illegal to use anything close to a Beatle's name when discussing the felon.