General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums
Pharlo
(1,847 posts)EYESORE 9001
(28,332 posts)Helluva way to go.
SocialDemocrat61
(4,682 posts)
highplainsdem
(56,321 posts)Please see this and the replies. Especially reply 5.
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100220351935
Disaffected
(5,613 posts)Please.
highplainsdem
(56,321 posts)I am not "calm" about theft and about environmental destruction, are you?
So just out of curiosity I wanted to check if my art has been scraped from the web and used by Stable Diffusion. They graciously allow you to do that on haveibeentrained.com. Behind this site is a site called Spawning.ai, and they state in their Q&A that copyright is an outdated system that is a bad fit for the AI era. They also state that We believe that [ ] the artist community will benefit from this [AI] training to be consensual. Let me explain briefly why I shudder when I read this: As an artist, the intellectual property right is the most important right I have. If I cant manage the rights to my art and decide who is allowed to do what with it, it becomes worthless. If everyone can just take it, how am I going to get paid?
I didnt expect to find anything because my art isnt like the digital AI art style that you see a lot from these image generators. I go field sketching, and create scientific illustrations, Im not a very well known artist either. But I was curious. The search result was a surprise. The site found countless examples of my art, scraped directly from my website and from other places on the web. What I found really unsettling is that the algorithm grouped many of my pictures directly together Im not sure if it really does that based on my style or on alt tag or url properties it was creepy moment.
https://juliabausenhardt.com/how-ai-is-stealing-your-art/
Generative artificial intelligence uses massive amounts of energy for computation and data storage and millions of gallons of water to cool the equipment at data centers. Now, legislators and regulators in the U.S. and the EU are starting to demand accountability.
Two months after its release in November 2022, OpenAIs ChatGPT had 100 million active users, and suddenly tech corporations were racing to offer the public more generative A.I. Pundits compared the new technologys impact to the Internet, or electrification, or the Industrial Revolution or the discovery of fire.
Time will sort hype from reality, but one consequence of the explosion of artificial intelligence is clear: this technologys environmental footprint is large and growing.
A.I. use is directly responsible for carbon emissions from non-renewable electricity and for the consumption of millions of gallons of fresh water, and it indirectly boosts impacts from building and maintaining the power-hungry equipment on which A.I. runs. As tech companies seek to embed high-intensity A.I. into everything from resume-writing to kidney transplant medicine and from choosing dog food to climate modeling, they cite many ways A.I. could help reduce humanitys environmental footprint. But legislators, regulators, activists, and international organizations now want to make sure the benefits arent outweighed by A.I.s mounting hazards.
https://e360.yale.edu/features/artificial-intelligence-climate-energy-emissions
highplainsdem
(56,321 posts)get points across without yelling.
But am I angry about all the harm done by generative AI? Of course. Every rational person should be.
And no one should be posting AI slop.
As for what I've posted about AI in general and ChatGPT specifically here over the last 2-1/2 years, you can use the Google site search in the upper right corner of every board page to search for
highplainsdem ai
highplainsdem chatgpt
to find some of the threads - hundreds of threads - I've posted about generative AI and its dangers. To find all of them, you'd have to get a Star membership to use Advanced Search here. And since it shows only 250 results at one time, you'd need to do multiple searches.
highplainsdem
(56,321 posts)well. But I think I'll leave the reply above anyway.
There are a lot of reasons to despise generative AI - more appearing all the time. Anyone doubting that's true can check my earlier threads.
There are few IF ANY good reasons to use generative AI. And all of them are outweighed by the harm it does.
Cirsium
(2,551 posts)Last edited Sat May 31, 2025, 12:50 AM - Edit history (1)
I wasn't referring to you. Sorry for any confusion. I agree with you.
highplainsdem
(56,321 posts)at them.
MayReasonRule
(3,406 posts)Your assumption and opinion is duly noted.
Vote Blue no matter what else you do!
highplainsdem
(56,321 posts)thread and particularly that reply I indicated.
Do you know who created the image in your OP? Because if you don't, they might not even be liberal. AI slop can be generated so easily and mindlessly that they could be trying various subjects randomly, just to get views. Saw AI slop here the other day from a YouTube account that had tried dragons, superheroes, time travel, etc., as subjects before discovering anti-Trump posts worked better as bait.
MayReasonRule
(3,406 posts)muriel_volestrangler
(103,794 posts)You're not thinking this through. It's not "mindless" or "random".
highplainsdem
(56,321 posts)depicted. I've seen a lot of accounts from AI artists hitting on all kinds of subjects. They're just trying to get views.
And genAI is illegally trained and unethical to use, period. See the thread and particularly the reply I recommended they look at.
muriel_volestrangler
(103,794 posts)Posting it here will mean fewer views of it wherever the person who got an AI program to produce it posted it, not more. You're just policing DU for any use of AI. The message of the picture is liberal.
highplainsdem
(56,321 posts)understand why AI slop is so harmful:
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100220351935
muriel_volestrangler
(103,794 posts)and I wonder why you keep pointing to EarlG's post when he specifically asked you not to?
highplainsdem
(56,321 posts)about his post on AI slop. I didn't mention here that it was EarlG's post.
muriel_volestrangler
(103,794 posts)The more times you try to get people to take a reply to you as justifying whatever you think yourself, the more like spam it looks.
highplainsdem
(56,321 posts)There are anti-Trump arguments and art made by real people whose views are known. They get less attention when people waste time on slop.
Traildogbob
(11,253 posts)The TACO Bell chihuahua with aTrump wig with a brown painted face, promoting TACOs, on Tuesdays, $45.47 for a dozen. (Only available to white people).
Noem provides the meat. Only ketchup as a condiment. Nine of that Latino pepper shit. This is MurKKKa.
lame54
(37,989 posts)Jerry2144
(2,863 posts)Sounds like a real restaurant
Mr.Bee
(757 posts)
BoRaGard
(5,653 posts)
lastlib
(25,999 posts)WhiskeyGrinder
(24,955 posts)highplainsdem
(56,321 posts)MayReasonRule
(3,406 posts)Maybe just block what you don't like instead of unduly disparaging what others find and post to share for fun.
Perhaps...
Either way... all my best to you and yours.
VOTE BLUE!
WhiskeyGrinder
(24,955 posts)highplainsdem
(56,321 posts)
Response to MayReasonRule (Original post)
NEOH This message was self-deleted by its author.
NEOH
(222 posts):Taco Belle could be Miss Lindsey Graham crazy:
TommieMommy
(2,010 posts)debsy
(600 posts)MayReasonRule
(3,406 posts)
twodogsbarking
(13,828 posts)relayerbob
(7,198 posts)orangecrush
(24,817 posts)