Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

turbinetree

(26,151 posts)
Tue May 27, 2025, 01:45 PM Tuesday

Jeff Bezos' Washington Post launches major newsroom clear-out

By Travis Gettys
Published May 27, 2025 1:03 PM ET

Washington Post owner Jeff Bezos is offering buyouts to dozens of staffers.

The newspaper has offered buyout packages to opinion writers, staffers with 10 years’ experience and entire departments, including the video desk, the copy desk and the sports copy desks, reported The Daily Beast.

“Like the rest of our industry, we are adapting to changing habits and new technologies that are transforming news experiences,” executive editor Matt Murray told staffers in a memo obtained by the Beast. “Even as we have begun creating new departments and welcoming new colleagues, to reach new audiences we must increase our staffing flexibility and expand in areas such as audience data and social video.”

Staffers were given until July to decide whether to accept the buyouts, but opinion staffers were also told the offer was meant to let them “make a clear-eyed decision on whether they want to be part of the new direction for Post Opinion.”

https://www.rawstory.com/jeff-bezos-washington-post-2672214970/

What a twisted POS, men and woman have died to have and protect the 1st Amendment..............changing habits............ no greed is the habit of decay in a democracy or what's left of it...........

20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Response to turbinetree (Original post)

Duppers

(28,348 posts)
8. ❓
Tue May 27, 2025, 09:50 PM
Tuesday

"Warren Buffet is one of the world's most prolific philanthropists and has pledged to give away more than 99% of his wealth. This kind-hearted nonagenarian donates billions each year to the Bill and Melinda Gates' foundation and he co-founded The Giving Pledge with Gates."

Not perfect but not that exactly despicable.


Passages

(2,814 posts)
18. Billionaires exist essentially due to their exemption from taxes.
Wed May 28, 2025, 08:28 AM
Wednesday

Billionaires should not exist, period.

Buffet loves his country so much that he could not find it within himself to endorse Harris for president.

He doesn't like to intervene in many issues.

Sanders wrote to the billionaire businessman and asked him to “intervene” on behalf of 450 striking steelworkers, who face possible pay cuts and increased health-care costs.
Buffett cited Berkshire’s policy of allowing companies it owns to handle labor and personnel decisions.

https://www.cnbc.com/2021/12/30/warren-buffett-tells-bernie-sanders-he-wont-intervene-in-special-metals-strike.html

dsc

(52,949 posts)
5. Even the original source wasn't very clear
Tue May 27, 2025, 02:23 PM
Tuesday

this could mean he offered to those with 10 years or less which would likely be at least a fourth of the work force or it could mean he targeted those with at least 10 years of experience. Though often buyouts are targeted to employees close to retirement and aren't considered age discrimination.

Ms. Toad

(37,003 posts)
10. Age discrimination is tied to age 40.
Tue May 27, 2025, 10:13 PM
Tuesday

And applies only to those discriminating against those over 40. So if it is a buyout that is unavailable to younger staffers it is not age discrimination.

But that technicality aside - anyone taking the buyout will do so pursuant to a signed agreement forfeiting the right to sue. Unless Bezos is really stupid. Any company that has ever had even passsing acquaintance with legal counsel has separation agreements that offer something more than they would get for resigning in exchange for forfeiting the right to sue for discrimination.

Celerity

(50,097 posts)
16. No.
Wed May 28, 2025, 04:46 AM
Wednesday
Age discrimination is tied to age 40. And applies only to those discriminating against those over 40.


DU shows that claim to be bollocks on a regular basis. Far too many here love a good youth bash and absolutely discriminate against us younger folk.

The youth hate here from some is one of the things I will miss the least when I leave DU.

Ms. Toad

(37,003 posts)
19. Perhaps you should fact check before calling something bollocks.
Wed May 28, 2025, 12:41 PM
Wednesday
https://www.eeoc.gov/statutes/age-discrimination-employment-act-1967

The ADEA prohibits employment discrimination against persons 40 years of age or older.


This question came up in a legal context (potential employment discrimination). I provided the legal answer.

I'm not suggesting that there aren't biases about all sorts of things - including age. But employment discrimination is a legal concept, and the law is designed to expressly a protects people over 40.

So no, people under 40 have no legal basis to challenge a buyout which favors older individuals. To the extent there might be a legal claim from people over 40 about being pushed out, any buyout agreement will be drafted to protect the employer from such claims.

Celerity

(50,097 posts)
20. I was speaking to general principle, not some narrowed legal basis. Sorry if that was not clear.
Wed May 28, 2025, 01:12 PM
Wednesday
 

Bonx

(2,353 posts)
4. Youg people appear to have abandoned WaPo and NYT.
Tue May 27, 2025, 02:07 PM
Tuesday

I don't see much of their stuff reposted on popular social media. The columnists and content don't resonate.

blogslug

(38,876 posts)
11. He could fully fund that paper, at a loss, and still have plenty of money.
Tue May 27, 2025, 10:45 PM
Tuesday

Instead, he kowtows to a tyrant and sends rich people to space in cruise ships.

fujiyamasan

(217 posts)
15. If Bezos wants to use the Post as his propaganda rag
Wed May 28, 2025, 12:44 AM
Wednesday

He may as well make it free, because I can’t imagine them holding on to too many more subscribers. As it is, I’m guessing he’s heavily subsidizing it at a loss.

The paper already lost several thousands of subscribers, columnists and editorialists after Bezos intervened to not have them endorse a candidate. I would imagine more journalists will leave at this rate, leaving it with little credibility.



Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Jeff Bezos' Washington Po...