General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHas Booker now gone Schumer in acquiescing to Trump? Voting for a Trump nominee is not the way to fight.
And so it seems to turn out that Sen. Booker's speech was just an ephemeral stunt to be forgotten:
Cory Booker promised to stand up to Trump. But he and convicted felon Charles Kushner go way back.
May 20, 2025/10:29 a.m. ET
Senator Cory Booker broke from the Democratic Party to confirm convicted felon Charles Kushnerfather of Trumps son-in-law Jared Kushneras the new U.S. ambassador to France.
Booker was the only Democrat to vote for the elder Kushners nomination. Kushner was convicted in 2005 for tax evasion, illegal campaign donations to the Democratic Party, and witness tampering. He even went so far as to retaliate against his sisterwho was a cooperating witness against him by paying a sex worker to seduce her husband and film it, likely for blackmail material. He was sentenced to two years in jail and was pardoned by President Trump at the end of 2020.
Kushner admitted that he paid a private investigator $25,000 to arrange for the seduction and videotaping of the cooperating witness husband. Kushner admitted to personally recruiting the prostitute and instructing that the videotape be mailed to the cooperating witness, the Department of Justice wrote in 2005. This is the man Booker bent over backward to make the new ambassador to one of our most important European allies.
Chris Christie, New Jerseys former Republican governor, who investigated Charles Kushner as district attorney, described his case as one of the most loathsome, disgusting crimes hed encountered.
...
https://newrepublic.com/post/195475/cory-booker-democrat-vote-confirm-jared-kushner-father-charles

Walleye
(40,726 posts)Including apple pie and motherhood, everything. Try this, senator no no no not gonna do it
SunImp
(2,485 posts)JohnSJ
(98,819 posts)In the case of voting for a crook to be ambassador to France, there is no ambiguity.
Ponietz
(3,807 posts)Charlie has helped fuel my hope, as well as made me believe that even in the questionable world of New Jersey politics, there are still spirits who dont simply act in their self-interest, Booker wrote glowingly of Kushner before he was sentenced.
Booker maintained his relationship with the Kushners. In 2013, Ivanka Trump and Jared Kushner hosted Booker at their home in a fundraising event that raised $41,000 for Booker. He defended this relationship in 2017, well after their (unsurprising) conservative turn.
Listen, I wouldnt take a dime from them now, but this was a time when they were Democrats, Booker said at the time. I mean, they were supporting Hillary Clinton, uh, and the Kushner family were big New Jersey Democrats, and really helped to fight against Chris Christie and a lot of other folks.
https://newrepublic.com/post/195475/cory-booker-democrat-vote-confirm-jared-kushner-father-charles
choie
(5,536 posts)And if you wouldnt, why would you vote for his confirmation. Thats called a lack of integrity. Whats more, Ill be watching to see if he does indeed refuse to take money from him for his reelection.
Ponietz
(3,807 posts)BlueTsunami2018
(4,395 posts)It doesnt really hurt anything since he was going to be confirmed no matter what and now the slate is clean. Its just politics.
To now dismiss the twenty-five hour holding of the floor because of this vote is, to me, ridiculous.
Were never going to win again. Everyone on the left has purity standards that no one can ever live up to.
betsuni
(27,961 posts)SunImp
(2,485 posts)Were never going to win again. Everyone on the left has purity standards that no one can ever live up to
Look at all the people angry at Beto/Pete etc for not hiding from reality. Many Democrats instantly said they wouldn't vote for them now just because they gave their honest opinions on Pres Biden. Look into the recent past where people argued against Sen Feinstein or Rep Connolly for their seats because they had age concerns & got flack for voicing those concerns by the same type of Dems that don't want to hear any criticism of Democratic leadership or Democrats that have seniority. These people constantly rallying that the left has a purity problem seem to conveniently ignore their own purity tests. You can see some now just ignoring the main topic here.
W_HAMILTON
(9,050 posts)
SunImp
(2,485 posts)I didn't want to make anyone cry for something so small so I fixed it
Cha
(311,391 posts)they don't Know All the Information.
My money is on Booker.
tritsofme
(19,210 posts)Fuck these ignorant little cheap shots on Schumer.
Response to tritsofme (Reply #5)
Post removed
Meowmee
(9,212 posts)Last edited Tue May 20, 2025, 06:21 PM - Edit history (1)
K Senior is a true criminal and awful person. There should be a rule about people who have been convicted of something like that being able to be appointed to anything or run for office.
In my opinion, from the beginning D should not have voted to confirm anybody. They shouldve just blocked everything. I guess it couldve caused a lot of problems though maybe.
Ping Tung
(2,500 posts)Last edited Tue May 20, 2025, 08:57 PM - Edit history (1)
]"Were parties here divided merely by a greediness for office,...to take a part with either would be unworthy of a reasonable or moral man." --Thomas Jefferson