Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

xocetaceans

(4,180 posts)
Tue May 20, 2025, 03:57 PM May 20

Has Booker now gone Schumer in acquiescing to Trump? Voting for a Trump nominee is not the way to fight.

And so it seems to turn out that Sen. Booker's speech was just an ephemeral stunt to be forgotten:

Why Did Cory Booker Vote to Confirm Jared Kushner’s Dad?
Cory Booker promised to stand up to Trump. But he and convicted felon Charles Kushner go way back.
May 20, 2025/10:29 a.m. ET

Senator Cory Booker broke from the Democratic Party to confirm convicted felon Charles Kushner—father of Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner—as the new U.S. ambassador to France.

Booker was the only Democrat to vote for the elder Kushner’s nomination. Kushner was convicted in 2005 for tax evasion, illegal campaign donations to the Democratic Party, and witness tampering. He even went so far as to retaliate against his sister—who was a cooperating witness against him— by paying a sex worker to seduce her husband and film it, likely for blackmail material. He was sentenced to two years in jail and was pardoned by President Trump at the end of 2020.

“Kushner admitted that he paid a private investigator $25,000 to arrange for the seduction and videotaping of the cooperating witness’ husband. Kushner admitted to personally recruiting the prostitute and instructing that the videotape be mailed to the cooperating witness,” the Department of Justice wrote in 2005. This is the man Booker bent over backward to make the new ambassador to one of our most important European allies.

Chris Christie, New Jersey’s former Republican governor, who investigated Charles Kushner as district attorney, described his case as “one of the most loathsome, disgusting crimes” he’d encountered.

...

https://newrepublic.com/post/195475/cory-booker-democrat-vote-confirm-jared-kushner-father-charles
17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Has Booker now gone Schumer in acquiescing to Trump? Voting for a Trump nominee is not the way to fight. (Original Post) xocetaceans May 20 OP
I suggested at the beginning of this term that the Democrats should oppose everything that Republicans put up. Walleye May 20 #1
Fight everything we reasonable can SunImp May 20 #12
With Schumer it could be argued that shutting down the government would have hurt us much more than not. JohnSJ May 20 #2
A simple internet search reveals this New Republic article: Ponietz May 20 #3
Why wouldnt you take a dime from him, Cory? choie May 20 #8
It's a club and we're not in it Ponietz May 20 #10
It was a favor returned. BlueTsunami2018 May 20 #4
Thank you. betsuni May 20 #7
Well moderate Dems have their own form of purity to be fair SunImp May 20 #11
"Democrat leadership" W_HAMILTON May 20 #13
Sorry, I posted it on my phone SunImp May 20 #15
I had read that. It's Ridiculous Piling on Sen Booker Wehn Cha May 20 #17
The framing of this OP is absolute fucking garbage. tritsofme May 20 #5
Yes. betsuni May 20 #9
Post removed Post removed May 20 #16
Sad to hear that Meowmee May 20 #6
Politics vs principles. They are seldom compatible. Ping Tung May 20 #14

Walleye

(40,726 posts)
1. I suggested at the beginning of this term that the Democrats should oppose everything that Republicans put up.
Tue May 20, 2025, 04:00 PM
May 20

Including apple pie and motherhood, everything. Try this, senator “no no no not gonna do it”

JohnSJ

(98,819 posts)
2. With Schumer it could be argued that shutting down the government would have hurt us much more than not.
Tue May 20, 2025, 04:03 PM
May 20

In the case of voting for a crook to be ambassador to France, there is no ambiguity.

Ponietz

(3,807 posts)
3. A simple internet search reveals this New Republic article:
Tue May 20, 2025, 04:30 PM
May 20
Booker and the Kushners go way back. Charles Kushner helped fund Booker’s first failed mayoral campaign in 2002, and Booker came to his defense when he was convicted in 2005.

“Charlie has helped fuel my hope, as well as made me believe that even in the questionable world of New Jersey politics, there are still spirits who don’t simply act in their self-interest,” Booker wrote glowingly of Kushner before he was sentenced.

Booker maintained his relationship with the Kushners. In 2013, Ivanka Trump and Jared Kushner hosted Booker at their home in a fundraising event that raised $41,000 for Booker. He defended this relationship in 2017, well after their (unsurprising) conservative turn.

“Listen, I wouldn’t take a dime from them now, but this was a time when they were Democrats,” Booker said at the time. “I mean, they were supporting Hillary Clinton, uh, and the Kushner family were big New Jersey Democrats, and really helped to fight against Chris Christie and a lot of other folks.”


https://newrepublic.com/post/195475/cory-booker-democrat-vote-confirm-jared-kushner-father-charles

choie

(5,536 posts)
8. Why wouldnt you take a dime from him, Cory?
Tue May 20, 2025, 05:56 PM
May 20

And if you wouldn’t, why would you vote for his confirmation. That’s called a lack of integrity. What’s more, I’ll be watching to see if he does indeed refuse to take money from him for his reelection.

BlueTsunami2018

(4,395 posts)
4. It was a favor returned.
Tue May 20, 2025, 04:49 PM
May 20

It doesn’t really hurt anything since he was going to be confirmed no matter what and now the slate is clean. It’s just politics.

To now dismiss the twenty-five hour holding of the floor because of this vote is, to me, ridiculous.

We’re never going to win again. Everyone on the left has purity standards that no one can ever live up to.

SunImp

(2,485 posts)
11. Well moderate Dems have their own form of purity to be fair
Tue May 20, 2025, 06:31 PM
May 20
We’re never going to win again. Everyone on the left has purity standards that no one can ever live up to

Look at all the people angry at Beto/Pete etc for not hiding from reality. Many Democrats instantly said they wouldn't vote for them now just because they gave their honest opinions on Pres Biden. Look into the recent past where people argued against Sen Feinstein or Rep Connolly for their seats because they had age concerns & got flack for voicing those concerns by the same type of Dems that don't want to hear any criticism of Democratic leadership or Democrats that have seniority. These people constantly rallying that the left has a purity problem seem to conveniently ignore their own purity tests. You can see some now just ignoring the main topic here.

SunImp

(2,485 posts)
15. Sorry, I posted it on my phone
Tue May 20, 2025, 06:46 PM
May 20

I didn't want to make anyone cry for something so small so I fixed it

Cha

(311,391 posts)
17. I had read that. It's Ridiculous Piling on Sen Booker Wehn
Tue May 20, 2025, 07:36 PM
May 20

they don't Know All the Information.

My money is on Booker.

tritsofme

(19,210 posts)
5. The framing of this OP is absolute fucking garbage.
Tue May 20, 2025, 05:07 PM
May 20

Fuck these ignorant little cheap shots on Schumer.

Response to tritsofme (Reply #5)

Meowmee

(9,212 posts)
6. Sad to hear that
Tue May 20, 2025, 05:19 PM
May 20

Last edited Tue May 20, 2025, 06:21 PM - Edit history (1)

K Senior is a true criminal and awful person. There should be a rule about people who have been convicted of something like that being able to be appointed to anything or run for office.

In my opinion, from the beginning D should not have voted to confirm anybody. They should’ve just blocked everything. I guess it could’ve caused a lot of problems though maybe.

Ping Tung

(2,500 posts)
14. Politics vs principles. They are seldom compatible.
Tue May 20, 2025, 06:44 PM
May 20

Last edited Tue May 20, 2025, 08:57 PM - Edit history (1)

]"Were parties here divided merely by a greediness for office,...to take a part with either would be unworthy of a reasonable or moral man." --Thomas Jefferson

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Has Booker now gone Schum...