Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsElon Musk's control of space is even more entrenched than it seems. What dangers could that lead to?

https://prospect.org/power/2025-05-19-rocketing-toward-monopoly-elon-musk-spacex/

Presidential sidekick Elon Musk has thus far been spared from the greatest risk to his interstellar empire: the continuity of hawkish antitrust enforcement between the Biden and Trump administrations. Thats good news for his company SpaceX and its subsidiary Starlink, which are in a plum position to dominate not only commercial space transportation, but space itself. By most accounts, Musk will soon depart government for the friendlier confines of his own private city after pulling out random wires from the federal motherboard. But if everything goes according to plan, the richest man on Earth will soon earn an even darker and stupider moniker: viceroy of low-Earth orbit.
More than half of satellites circling the Earth are currently owned by Starlink, launched into our atmosphere using SpaceX Falcon rockets, and the company is now petitioning to launch tens of thousands more. Starlink gained new eligibility from Trumps Commerce Department to wire much of the underserved parts of the country with satellite internet. There are now Starlink satellite systems serving the White House, and Starlink contracts upgrading IT for a Federal Aviation Administration in disarray thanks to cuts by DOGE, Musks hand-selected government-destroying apparatus. If that wasnt enough, Republicans could soon steer wireless spectrum auctions Starlinks way, which could bulk up the companys satellite capacity even further.
Meanwhile, SpaceX has raked in billions of dollars in government contracts sending satellites and astronauts into space, while also collecting millions from private entities using SpaceX rockets to further their own space enterprises. President Trumps proposed budget for the next fiscal year would shower further billions on SpaceX for a back-to-the-future missile defense system and manned flights to Mars and the moon.

The federal governments reliance on SpaceX started well before the Trump administration, and for good reason. SpaceX rockets have proved efficient, reusable, and cost-effective. SpaceX enjoyed $3.8 billion in federal contracts in 2024, the last year of the Biden administration. But critics, including those inside the Department of Defense, have sounded the alarm on the increasing dominance of a single company. Heaven forbid we have a mishap with a Falcon 9 launch, Col. Richard Kniseley, an officer in the Space Forces Commercial Space Office, told The New York Times last year. That means it is grounded, right? And that means we could be without launch. Kniseleys concern is just one among many related to SpaceX dominating the full range of space services.
snip
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Elon Musk's control of space is even more entrenched than it seems. What dangers could that lead to? (Original Post)
Celerity
May 19
OP
Moostache
(10,532 posts)1. Can you overdose on Ketamine?
I'm asking for a friend...
harumph
(2,742 posts)2. They're in low earth orbit which means they have to be constantly replaced.
If it becomes a monopoly, it'll be a fairly fragile one.